An evaluation of brain volume and cortical thickness measurement at 0.55 T

PURPOSE: To determine the feasibility of anatomical neuroimaging studies using 0.55 T MRI. METHODS: MPRAGE images with 1 mm isotropic resolution were acquired from a cohort of five healthy subjects using both 0.55 T and 3 T scanners, including repeat scans of each subject at each field strength. The 0.55 T images were denoised to mitigate the effects of high resolution and low-field strength. All scans were analyzed using BrainSuite and FreeSurfer image analysis software, which performs operations including tissue classification, region segmentation/labeling, and thickness/volume measurements for different brain regions. Regional cortical thickness measurements and regional brain volume measurements were compared, and test-retest repeatability at each field strength was evaluated. RESULTS: For both image analysis software tools, we observed reasonably good correlations between field strengths for cortical thickness measures and regional brain volume measures. Test-retest repeatability analysis suggests that experimental variability was generally higher at 0.55 T than at 3 T, although the amount of difference was dependent on the specific measure being considered and the software tool that was used. CONCLUSION: While our sample size was small which limits the strength of the conclusions we can draw, this small-scale pilot study suggests the potential feasibility of certain types of anatomical neuroimaging studies at 0.55 T (especially those involving volume measurements), assuming that appropriate adjustments are made to account for increased experimental variability at this field strength.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics Biology and Medicine
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-026-01380-5
Primary Topic
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An evaluation of brain volume and cortical thickness measurement at 0.55 T

Hao‐Ting Kung, Chin‐Cheng Chan, Justin P. Haldar, Sophia Cui et al.
Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics Biology and Medicine
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
article

An evaluation of brain volume and cortical thickness measurement at 0.55 T

Hao‐Ting Kung, Chin‐Cheng Chan, Justin P. Haldar, Sophia Cui, Anand A. Joshi, Jonas T. Kaplan, Krishna S. Nayak, Richard M. Leahy
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the feasibility of anatomical neuroimaging studies using 0.55 T MRI. METHODS: MPRAGE images with 1 mm isotropic resolution were acquired from a cohort of five healthy subjects using both 0.55 T and 3 T scanners, including repeat scans of each subject at each field strength. The 0.55 T images were denoised to mitigate the effects of high resolution and low-field strength. All scans were analyzed using BrainSuite and FreeSurfer image analysis software, which performs operations including tissue classification, region segmentation/labeling, and thickness/volume measurements for different brain regions. Regional cortical thickness measurements and regional brain volume measurements were compared, and test-retest repeatability at each field strength was evaluated. RESULTS: For both image analysis software tools, we observed reasonably good correlations between field strengths for cortical thickness measures and regional brain volume measures. Test-retest repeatability analysis suggests that experimental variability was generally higher at 0.55 T than at 3 T, although the amount of difference was dependent on the specific measure being considered and the software tool that was used. CONCLUSION: While our sample size was small which limits the strength of the conclusions we can draw, this small-scale pilot study suggests the potential feasibility of certain types of anatomical neuroimaging studies at 0.55 T (especially those involving volume measurements), assuming that appropriate adjustments are made to account for increased experimental variability at this field strength.

Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics Biology and Medicine
University of Southern California (US), Medical Solutions (GB)
National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Defense, Siemens Healthineers, National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.