Factors influencing implementation decisions in health care: A discrete choice experiment of intervention adoption

BACKGROUND: To overcome barriers to the implementation of effective interventions, it is important to understand the factors which may influence stakeholders' implementation decisions. We aimed to identify these factors and quantify their relative importance in the decision-making process. Stakeholders included those wishing to implement an intervention (e.g., health service researchers and providers), and those funding implementation efforts (e.g., administrators and policymakers). DESIGN: We utilized discrete choice experiment methodology to explore several factors relevant to implementation decisions. The survey instrument was developed through a systematic review and expert consultation process. Conditional and mixed logit models were used to capture observed and unobserved preference heterogeneity. We tested the robustness of our results with subgroup and sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: We received 131 survey responses. There was a strong preference for intervention factors that 1) met stakeholders' needs, 2) had excellent levels of evidence, and 3) demonstrated strong organizational readiness. Respondents showed a preference for the mid-level cost ($150,000) over the lowest cost level ($100,000) within the experimental cost attribute (relative to an annual budget of $5 million). This suggests that respondents may prioritize the other three factors over the cost of implementation. These results remained relatively consistent across professional subgroups and sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Meeting stakeholders' needs, levels of evidence, and organizational readiness had a large influence on implementation decisions. These factors were ranked of higher importance than implementation costs, administrative processes, and the presence of local champions within an organization. Designing research programs that support these influential factors will encourage successful implementation and ensure optimal healthcare delivery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hjdsi.2026.100786
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Factors influencing implementation decisions in health care: A discrete choice experiment of intervention adoption

Jason J. Ong, Alayna Carrandi, Alisa M. Higgins, Amy Grove et al.
Healthcare
Health Policy Implementation Science
article

Factors influencing implementation decisions in health care: A discrete choice experiment of intervention adoption

Jason J. Ong, Alayna Carrandi, Alisa M. Higgins, Amy Grove, Helen Skouteris, Thao Thai
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To overcome barriers to the implementation of effective interventions, it is important to understand the factors which may influence stakeholders' implementation decisions. We aimed to identify these factors and quantify their relative importance in the decision-making process. Stakeholders included those wishing to implement an intervention (e.g., health service researchers and providers), and those funding implementation efforts (e.g., administrators and policymakers). DESIGN: We utilized discrete choice experiment methodology to explore several factors relevant to implementation decisions. The survey instrument was developed through a systematic review and expert consultation process. Conditional and mixed logit models were used to capture observed and unobserved preference heterogeneity. We tested the robustness of our results with subgroup and sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: We received 131 survey responses. There was a strong preference for intervention factors that 1) met stakeholders' needs, 2) had excellent levels of evidence, and 3) demonstrated strong organizational readiness. Respondents showed a preference for the mid-level cost ($150,000) over the lowest cost level ($100,000) within the experimental cost attribute (relative to an annual budget of $5 million). This suggests that respondents may prioritize the other three factors over the cost of implementation. These results remained relatively consistent across professional subgroups and sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Meeting stakeholders' needs, levels of evidence, and organizational readiness had a large influence on implementation decisions. These factors were ranked of higher importance than implementation costs, administrative processes, and the presence of local champions within an organization. Designing research programs that support these influential factors will encourage successful implementation and ensure optimal healthcare delivery.

HealthcareVol. 14(2)
Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society (AU), Melbourne Sexual Health Centre (AU), Monash Health (AU), Monash University (AU), University of Birmingham (GB)
National Institute for Health and Care Research, National Health and Medical Research Council
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Health Policy Implementation Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.