Cybersecurity laws, digital crimes, and ethical considerations: a multidimensional perspective on Cyber Risk Regulation (MPoCRR)

Cybersecurity has evolved from a purely technological issue to a complex one involving law, ethics, and governance due to the fact that the rapid digital transition has exposed unprecedented vulnerabilities inside cloud computing, artificial intelligence (AI), and Internet of Things (IoT) ecosystems. The Global Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), and the Network and Information Security (NIS) Directive are all part of the international regulatory frameworks that are compared in this study, which is titled “Cybersecurity Laws, Digital Crimes, and Ethical Considerations: A Multidimensional Perspective on Cyber Risk Regulation (MPoCRR).” The study methodically organizes the comparison using secondary sources and a qualitative technique, utilizing structured matrices to assess enforcement capability, ethical sensitivity, and legislative scope. Cybercrime is defined differently in different jurisdictions, and enforcement procedures and the incorporation of ethics into digital policy also differ significantly, according to the results. In contrast to European frameworks, American regulations show more sectoral specialization and less cohesive cross-border data governance and are less ethically sensitive. According to the research, it is becoming more difficult to adhere to conventional norms of transparency, privacy, and equity in the face of new technological developments such as algorithmic bias and AI-driven spying. The study concludes that the present cybersecurity regulations are ineffective in dealing with the increasingly globalized and AI-enhanced threat landscape because they are reactive and fragmented. Integrating ethical AI norms with data protection principles and legal compliance, it proposes a uniform global cybersecurity governance structure. To bridge the gap between digital risk management and ethics, lawmakers might use the MPoCRR model as a guide. This model puts an emphasis on cyber governance that is flexible, open, and guided by ethics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cloud Computing Advances Systems and Applications
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13677-025-00824-y
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
27.86

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cybersecurity laws, digital crimes, and ethical considerations: a multidimensional perspective on Cyber Risk Regulation (MPoCRR)

Jafar Ababneh, Ala’a Al-Shaikh, Amer Abu-Jassar, Hani Attar et al.
1 citations
Journal of Cloud Computing Advances Systems and Applications
Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
27.86
article

Cybersecurity laws, digital crimes, and ethical considerations: a multidimensional perspective on Cyber Risk Regulation (MPoCRR)

Jafar Ababneh, Ala’a Al-Shaikh, Amer Abu-Jassar, Hani Attar, Mohamed Hafez, Abdulmajeed Alzara
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Cybersecurity has evolved from a purely technological issue to a complex one involving law, ethics, and governance due to the fact that the rapid digital transition has exposed unprecedented vulnerabilities inside cloud computing, artificial intelligence (AI), and Internet of Things (IoT) ecosystems. The Global Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), and the Network and Information Security (NIS) Directive are all part of the international regulatory frameworks that are compared in this study, which is titled “Cybersecurity Laws, Digital Crimes, and Ethical Considerations: A Multidimensional Perspective on Cyber Risk Regulation (MPoCRR).” The study methodically organizes the comparison using secondary sources and a qualitative technique, utilizing structured matrices to assess enforcement capability, ethical sensitivity, and legislative scope. Cybercrime is defined differently in different jurisdictions, and enforcement procedures and the incorporation of ethics into digital policy also differ significantly, according to the results. In contrast to European frameworks, American regulations show more sectoral specialization and less cohesive cross-border data governance and are less ethically sensitive. According to the research, it is becoming more difficult to adhere to conventional norms of transparency, privacy, and equity in the face of new technological developments such as algorithmic bias and AI-driven spying. The study concludes that the present cybersecurity regulations are ineffective in dealing with the increasingly globalized and AI-enhanced threat landscape because they are reactive and fragmented. Integrating ethical AI norms with data protection principles and legal compliance, it proposes a uniform global cybersecurity governance structure. To bridge the gap between digital risk management and ethics, lawmakers might use the MPoCRR model as a guide. This model puts an emphasis on cyber governance that is flexible, open, and guided by ethics.

Journal of Cloud Computing Advances Systems and ApplicationsVol. 15(1)
INTI International University (MY), Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan (JO), Amman Arab University (JO), Zarqa University (JO), Shinawatra University (TH), Mutah University (JO), Nilai University (MY), University of Business and Technology (SA)
Zarqa University
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
27.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.