Assessing pangolin scale morphology and genetic identifiability following varied processing treatments

Abstract Pangolins are among the most heavily trafficked mammals worldwide, with their scales widely traded for traditional medicine. Recent enforcement reports highlight an emerging challenge which involves the trafficking of processed scales, which are more difficult to visually recognise and often with degraded DNA. As processing alters both morphology and DNA integrity, reliable species identification from such material is uncertain, yet remains essential for forensic investigation and enforcement as well as conservation. Here, we experimentally assessed the impacts of four trade-reported processing treatments on Sunda pangolin ( Manis javanica ) scales. We quantified changes in physical traits (length, width, thickness, and hardness) and evaluated how processing affected DNA quantity and consequently, molecular identification success using Bayesian logistic regressions. We found that processing altered scale appearance (causing thickening, yellowing, blistering, and burnt marks) but diagnostic morphological features remained intact, enabling recognition of pangolin origin. To support enforcement practice, we provided a guide for morphological identification of processed scales. DNA quantity was also not a strong predictor of species assignment; while higher concentrations improved identification success, many low-yield samples still produced viable sequences. Despite processing treatments causing DNA degradation, we found that the overall probability of successful species identification across treatments remained at 89.7%, with even the most damaging treatment of frying with sand plus vinegar quenching, still yielding a relatively high probability of identification of 76.3%. These findings emphasise the importance of an integrative approach to processed scale identification, with morphological traits providing a rapid and accessible first line of assessment, while molecular tools providing confirmation and resolution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Conservation
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44353-026-00103-0
Primary Topic
Identification and Quantification in Food
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing pangolin scale morphology and genetic identifiability following varied processing treatments

Charlene Judith Fernandez, Max D. Y. Khoo, Darren Yeo, Choon Beng How et al.
Discover Conservation
Identification and Quantification in Food
article

Assessing pangolin scale morphology and genetic identifiability following varied processing treatments

Charlene Judith Fernandez, Max D. Y. Khoo, Darren Yeo, Choon Beng How, Kum C. Hiong, Xiaoge Ping, Siow Foong Chang, JASMINE ONG, Renhui Xie, Alvin Wee, Shizhe Li, Anna May Shih Wong, Yan Zeng, Amy Hee Joo Chan
article en

Abstract

Abstract Pangolins are among the most heavily trafficked mammals worldwide, with their scales widely traded for traditional medicine. Recent enforcement reports highlight an emerging challenge which involves the trafficking of processed scales, which are more difficult to visually recognise and often with degraded DNA. As processing alters both morphology and DNA integrity, reliable species identification from such material is uncertain, yet remains essential for forensic investigation and enforcement as well as conservation. Here, we experimentally assessed the impacts of four trade-reported processing treatments on Sunda pangolin ( Manis javanica ) scales. We quantified changes in physical traits (length, width, thickness, and hardness) and evaluated how processing affected DNA quantity and consequently, molecular identification success using Bayesian logistic regressions. We found that processing altered scale appearance (causing thickening, yellowing, blistering, and burnt marks) but diagnostic morphological features remained intact, enabling recognition of pangolin origin. To support enforcement practice, we provided a guide for morphological identification of processed scales. DNA quantity was also not a strong predictor of species assignment; while higher concentrations improved identification success, many low-yield samples still produced viable sequences. Despite processing treatments causing DNA degradation, we found that the overall probability of successful species identification across treatments remained at 89.7%, with even the most damaging treatment of frying with sand plus vinegar quenching, still yielding a relatively high probability of identification of 76.3%. These findings emphasise the importance of an integrative approach to processed scale identification, with morphological traits providing a rapid and accessible first line of assessment, while molecular tools providing confirmation and resolution.

Discover ConservationVol. 3(1)
National Parks Board (SG), Institute of Zoology (KZ)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Identification and Quantification in Food
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.