National Context and STEM Career Expectations: Social Comparison and Gender Differences Across 72 Economies

ABSTRACT Adolescents’ career expectations play a pivotal role in shaping identity and future opportunities, yet little is known about how national‐level comparisons influence these expectations. Drawing on social comparison theory, this study examines how relative standing in science achievement, socioeconomic status (SES), and math self‐efficacy is related to expectations for science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) careers. Using PISA 2022 data from over 560,000 students across 72 economies, multilevel generalized linear models revealed more assimilation effects at the school level and more contrast effects at the country level, with distinct gendered and domain‐specific patterns. Girls’ STEM expectations were more strongly associated with academic comparisons, while boys’ expectations were more closely related to SES. Within STEM, information and communications technology careers required broad comparative advantages, whereas science, engineering, and health careers showed mixed gender patterns. Findings highlight that adolescents calibrate career expectations not only against local peers but also against national standards, underscoring the need for career guidance and education policies to reduce SES barriers and gender inequities in STEM.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Career Development Quarterly
Published
2026-06-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cdq.70031
Primary Topic
Career Development and Diversity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

National Context and STEM Career Expectations: Social Comparison and Gender Differences Across 72 Economies

Luyang Guo
The Career Development Quarterly
Career Development and Diversity
article

National Context and STEM Career Expectations: Social Comparison and Gender Differences Across 72 Economies

Luyang Guo
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Adolescents’ career expectations play a pivotal role in shaping identity and future opportunities, yet little is known about how national‐level comparisons influence these expectations. Drawing on social comparison theory, this study examines how relative standing in science achievement, socioeconomic status (SES), and math self‐efficacy is related to expectations for science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) careers. Using PISA 2022 data from over 560,000 students across 72 economies, multilevel generalized linear models revealed more assimilation effects at the school level and more contrast effects at the country level, with distinct gendered and domain‐specific patterns. Girls’ STEM expectations were more strongly associated with academic comparisons, while boys’ expectations were more closely related to SES. Within STEM, information and communications technology careers required broad comparative advantages, whereas science, engineering, and health careers showed mixed gender patterns. Findings highlight that adolescents calibrate career expectations not only against local peers but also against national standards, underscoring the need for career guidance and education policies to reduce SES barriers and gender inequities in STEM.

The Career Development Quarterly
University of Macau (MO)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Career Development and Diversity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

National Context and STEM Career Expectations: Social Comparison and Gender Differences Across 72 Economies — Luyang Guo · The Career Development Quarterly (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS