From democracy to high-tech entrepreneurship

Abstract Democracy is increasingly viewed as a core institutional condition for entrepreneurship, yet evidence remains mixed on what types of entrepreneurial activity it shapes and how. This study develops and tests a differentiated framework linking improvements in electoral democracy to two outcomes: total early-stage entrepreneurial activity (TEA) and high-tech entrepreneurship activity. Using data on 81 developing and developed countries over 2000–2022 we extend the democracy–entrepreneurship literature by moving from the general question of whether democracy fosters entrepreneurship to whether it is TEA or high-tech entrepreneurship which democracy affects. We also argue that democracy shapes entrepreneurship activity through institutional mechanisms of property-rights protection and government size. Our findings demonstrate that linear improvements in democracy are not directly associated with TEA and high-tech entrepreneurship. Property rights are positively associated with high-tech entrepreneurship, but that they do not moderate the democracy–high-tech entrepreneurship relationship.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Technology Transfer
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-026-10360-9
Primary Topic
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From democracy to high-tech entrepreneurship

B. David Audretsch, Maksim Belitski, Rosa Caiazza
The Journal of Technology Transfer
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
article

From democracy to high-tech entrepreneurship

B. David Audretsch, Maksim Belitski, Rosa Caiazza
article en

Abstract

Abstract Democracy is increasingly viewed as a core institutional condition for entrepreneurship, yet evidence remains mixed on what types of entrepreneurial activity it shapes and how. This study develops and tests a differentiated framework linking improvements in electoral democracy to two outcomes: total early-stage entrepreneurial activity (TEA) and high-tech entrepreneurship activity. Using data on 81 developing and developed countries over 2000–2022 we extend the democracy–entrepreneurship literature by moving from the general question of whether democracy fosters entrepreneurship to whether it is TEA or high-tech entrepreneurship which democracy affects. We also argue that democracy shapes entrepreneurship activity through institutional mechanisms of property-rights protection and government size. Our findings demonstrate that linear improvements in democracy are not directly associated with TEA and high-tech entrepreneurship. Property rights are positively associated with high-tech entrepreneurship, but that they do not moderate the democracy–high-tech entrepreneurship relationship.

The Journal of Technology Transfer
Parthenope University of Naples (IT), Indiana University Bloomington (US), University of Reading (GB)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.