The importance of social vulnerability and exclusion in cancer prognosis and survival: a scoping review

BACKGROUND: Cancer prognosis and survival are determined not only by biological and clinical factors, but also by patients' social environments. Social vulnerability, including socioeconomic deprivation, limited education, weak social networks, and social exclusion, can critically influence diagnosis, treatment adherence, and outcomes. This scoping review aims to synthesize the current evidence on the impact of social vulnerability and exclusion on cancer outcomes, comprising prognosis, survival, quality of life, and related psychosocial factors. METHODS: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines, a comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for studies published between 2014 and 2025. Eligible studies included those evaluating associations between social determinants and oncological outcomes among adult cancer patients. RESULTS: A total of 32 studies were included, encompassing 92,291 patients. The majority were observational, including cross-sectional (n = 16), prospective cohort studies (n = 13) and retrospective studies (n = 3). The most frequent analyzed variables included marital and socioeconomic status, education and social support. Patients with stable social networks and higher socioeconomic levels showed better treatment adherence, psychological well-being, and survival; while social isolation, low income, and residence in deprived areas were associated with later diagnosis and worse prognosis. Several studies used validated indices to assess social vulnerability, such as the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) and the Social Vulnerability Screening Index (SVSI). CONCLUSIONS: Social vulnerability and exclusion are important, yet often under-recognized or undervalued determinants of cancer outcomes. The integration of social assessment into the care of cancer patients would facilitate the implementation of individualized interventions tailored to each patient's social context and needs. Such an approach could enhance equity in access to care, improve treatment adherence, and enable the early identification and mitigation of factors associated with social exclusion or vulnerability, ultimately contributing to improved survival outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical & Translational Oncology
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-026-04461-y
Primary Topic
Cancer survivorship and care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The importance of social vulnerability and exclusion in cancer prognosis and survival: a scoping review

Josep Gumà, Meritxell Arenas, Raquel García-Pablo, Gemma Benitez-Gabella et al.
Clinical & Translational Oncology
Cancer survivorship and care
article

The importance of social vulnerability and exclusion in cancer prognosis and survival: a scoping review

Josep Gumà, Meritxell Arenas, Raquel García-Pablo, Gemma Benitez-Gabella, Albert Moragas-Fernández, Rocío Benavides-Villareal, Marta Canela-Capdevila, Cecília Escuin-Troncho
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cancer prognosis and survival are determined not only by biological and clinical factors, but also by patients' social environments. Social vulnerability, including socioeconomic deprivation, limited education, weak social networks, and social exclusion, can critically influence diagnosis, treatment adherence, and outcomes. This scoping review aims to synthesize the current evidence on the impact of social vulnerability and exclusion on cancer outcomes, comprising prognosis, survival, quality of life, and related psychosocial factors. METHODS: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines, a comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for studies published between 2014 and 2025. Eligible studies included those evaluating associations between social determinants and oncological outcomes among adult cancer patients. RESULTS: A total of 32 studies were included, encompassing 92,291 patients. The majority were observational, including cross-sectional (n = 16), prospective cohort studies (n = 13) and retrospective studies (n = 3). The most frequent analyzed variables included marital and socioeconomic status, education and social support. Patients with stable social networks and higher socioeconomic levels showed better treatment adherence, psychological well-being, and survival; while social isolation, low income, and residence in deprived areas were associated with later diagnosis and worse prognosis. Several studies used validated indices to assess social vulnerability, such as the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) and the Social Vulnerability Screening Index (SVSI). CONCLUSIONS: Social vulnerability and exclusion are important, yet often under-recognized or undervalued determinants of cancer outcomes. The integration of social assessment into the care of cancer patients would facilitate the implementation of individualized interventions tailored to each patient's social context and needs. Such an approach could enhance equity in access to care, improve treatment adherence, and enable the early identification and mitigation of factors associated with social exclusion or vulnerability, ultimately contributing to improved survival outcomes.

Clinical & Translational Oncology
Institut de Recerca Biomèdica Catalunya Sud (ES), Hospital Universitari Sant Joan de Reus (ES), Universitat Rovira i Virgili (ES)
Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Agència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Cancer survivorship and care
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.