Effect of Fourth-Line Antihypertensive Therapy on Clinic Systolic Blood Pressure in Resistant Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND: Resistant hypertension (rHTN) is defined as uncontrolled blood pressure despite ≥3 antihypertensives, including a diuretic. While fourth-line intensification is recommended, comparative evidence remains scattered. RESEARCH QUESTIONS/HYPOTHESIS: This meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy and safety of fourth-line antihypertensives in reducing clinic systolic blood pressure (SBP) in rHTN. METHODS/APPROACH: A literature search across PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science (2015-2026) identified eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of ≥4 weeks duration. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane RoB 2. An initially planned network meta-analysis was deemed unreliable due to statistical inconsistencies and transitivity violations across the evidence base. Consequently, data were analyzed via pairwise meta-analysis using R software (version 4.5.1) to calculate mean differences (MD) and risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS/DATA: Eleven RCTs involving 3,931 adults with rHTN were included. Pairwise comparisons against placebo showed that aldosterone targeted therapies produced the largest reductions in SBP, with lorundrostat (MD -11.70 mmHg [95% CI -16.07, -7.33]) and baxdrostat 2 mg (MD -10.10 [-12.63, -7.58]) showing comparable effects, while baxdrostat 1 mg (MD -8.56 [-11.08 to -6.04]) demonstrated reductions similar in magnitude to spironolactone (MD -7.95 [-10.10, -5.80]). β-blockers, including bisoprolol (MD = -6.71 mm Hg), also demonstrated modest SBP reductions, while aprocitentan 12.5 mg reduced SBP by -3.80 mmHg [-6.65, -0.95]. No intervention significantly increased serious adverse events versus placebo. Significant increases in any adverse events were observed with aprocitentan 25 mg (RR 1.89 [1.39, 2.57]) and doxazosin (RR 1.55 [1.09, 2.20]). CONCLUSIONS: Fourth-line agents targeting the aldosterone pathway, including aldosterone synthase inhibitors and spironolactone, provide clinically significant SBP reductions in rHTN without increasing serious adverse event risk. Due to transitivity violations across trials, indirect comparative rankings remain invalid. Future trials are required to establish efficacy and assess outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood Pressure
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/08037051.2026.2696695
Primary Topic
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of Fourth-Line Antihypertensive Therapy on Clinic Systolic Blood Pressure in Resistant Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Dhvanit Rajdeep, Z. Jamshaid, Taha Alam, Sohaima Kamal et al.
Blood Pressure
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
article

Effect of Fourth-Line Antihypertensive Therapy on Clinic Systolic Blood Pressure in Resistant Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Dhvanit Rajdeep, Z. Jamshaid, Taha Alam, Sohaima Kamal, Taha Ibrahim, Noor Un Nisa, Muhammad Hassan, Hira Arshad Jawed, Muhammad Saad, Noor Un Nisa, Muhammad Hussain
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND: Resistant hypertension (rHTN) is defined as uncontrolled blood pressure despite ≥3 antihypertensives, including a diuretic. While fourth-line intensification is recommended, comparative evidence remains scattered. RESEARCH QUESTIONS/HYPOTHESIS: This meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy and safety of fourth-line antihypertensives in reducing clinic systolic blood pressure (SBP) in rHTN. METHODS/APPROACH: A literature search across PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science (2015-2026) identified eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of ≥4 weeks duration. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane RoB 2. An initially planned network meta-analysis was deemed unreliable due to statistical inconsistencies and transitivity violations across the evidence base. Consequently, data were analyzed via pairwise meta-analysis using R software (version 4.5.1) to calculate mean differences (MD) and risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS/DATA: Eleven RCTs involving 3,931 adults with rHTN were included. Pairwise comparisons against placebo showed that aldosterone targeted therapies produced the largest reductions in SBP, with lorundrostat (MD -11.70 mmHg [95% CI -16.07, -7.33]) and baxdrostat 2 mg (MD -10.10 [-12.63, -7.58]) showing comparable effects, while baxdrostat 1 mg (MD -8.56 [-11.08 to -6.04]) demonstrated reductions similar in magnitude to spironolactone (MD -7.95 [-10.10, -5.80]). β-blockers, including bisoprolol (MD = -6.71 mm Hg), also demonstrated modest SBP reductions, while aprocitentan 12.5 mg reduced SBP by -3.80 mmHg [-6.65, -0.95]. No intervention significantly increased serious adverse events versus placebo. Significant increases in any adverse events were observed with aprocitentan 25 mg (RR 1.89 [1.39, 2.57]) and doxazosin (RR 1.55 [1.09, 2.20]). CONCLUSIONS: Fourth-line agents targeting the aldosterone pathway, including aldosterone synthase inhibitors and spironolactone, provide clinically significant SBP reductions in rHTN without increasing serious adverse event risk. Due to transitivity violations across trials, indirect comparative rankings remain invalid. Future trials are required to establish efficacy and assess outcomes.

Blood Pressure
Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Center (PK), King Edward Medical University (PK), Caucasus University (GE), Jinnah Sindh Medical University (PK), Nangarhar University (AF), Dow University of Health Sciences (PK), World Water Watch (US), Caucasus International University (GE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.