Making Retroduction Transparent: Integrating Danermark's Explanatory Protocol and the RRREIC Framework for Mechanism-Based Explanation in Critical Realist Qualitative Research

Despite the growing influence of Critical Realism (CR) in organisational research, a persistent gap separates its philosophical commitments from its methodological practice: studies claiming a CR orientation routinely invoke retroduction and generative mechanisms without specifying how those concepts are implemented in data analysis. This article addresses this gap by introducing a practically operationalised, replicable analytical protocol integrating Danermark et al.'s (2002) seven-stage explanatory protocol with the RRREIC inferential framework. Three methodological contributions are made: (1) a replicable seven-stage protocol supported by five ready-to-use instruments; (2) the novel principle of prospective instrument-framework alignment; and (3) reconceptualisation of the Correction stage as the primary site of theoretical development through negative cases. All instruments are provided as ready-to-use templates. Submitted to Organizational Research Methods (SAGE).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21026129
Primary Topic
Critical Realism in Sociology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Making Retroduction Transparent: Integrating Danermark's Explanatory Protocol and the RRREIC Framework for Mechanism-Based Explanation in Critical Realist Qualitative Research

Valerii Morozov
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Critical Realism in Sociology
article

Making Retroduction Transparent: Integrating Danermark's Explanatory Protocol and the RRREIC Framework for Mechanism-Based Explanation in Critical Realist Qualitative Research

Valerii Morozov
article en

Abstract

Despite the growing influence of Critical Realism (CR) in organisational research, a persistent gap separates its philosophical commitments from its methodological practice: studies claiming a CR orientation routinely invoke retroduction and generative mechanisms without specifying how those concepts are implemented in data analysis. This article addresses this gap by introducing a practically operationalised, replicable analytical protocol integrating Danermark et al.'s (2002) seven-stage explanatory protocol with the RRREIC inferential framework. Three methodological contributions are made: (1) a replicable seven-stage protocol supported by five ready-to-use instruments; (2) the novel principle of prospective instrument-framework alignment; and (3) reconceptualisation of the Correction stage as the primary site of theoretical development through negative cases. All instruments are provided as ready-to-use templates. Submitted to Organizational Research Methods (SAGE).

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Bangkok University (TH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Critical Realism in Sociology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Making Retroduction Transparent: Integrating Danermark's Explanatory Protocol and the RRREIC Framework for Mechanism-Based Explanation in Critical Realist Qualitative Research — Valerii Morozov · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS