Comparative efficacy of tislelizumab + FOLFOX or CAPOX for gastric/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: an exploratory matching-adjusted indirect comparison

Objective In the RATIONALE-305 trial, first-line tislelizumab + chemotherapy (CAPOX ([capecitabine + oxaliplatin] or 5-fluorouracil [5-FU] + cisplatin) significantly improved overall and progression-free survival (PFS) versus placebo + chemotherapy in unresectable or metastatic human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer (GC/GEJC). This exploratory analysis evaluated the comparative efficacy of tislelizumab + CAPOX versus tislelizumab + CAPOX or FOLFOX (5-FU, leucovorin, oxaliplatin) using a matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) approach.Methods An unanchored MAIC was performed, weighting individual patient data from RATIONALE-305 (tislelizumab + CAPOX) to match the DisTinGuish Part C (tislelizumab + CAPOX or tislelizumab + FOLFOX) aggregate population. After matching, hazard ratios (HRs) for PFS and odds ratios (ORs) for objective response rate (ORR) were calculated in base-case and sensitivity analyses.Results Baseline characteristics were well balanced post-matching (i.e. weighting). In the base case, compared with tislelizumab + CAPOX, median PFS was numerically longer with tislelizumab + CAPOX or tislelizumab + FOLFOX (7.2 vs. 10.5 months [HR 1.24; 95% CI 0.93–1.65; p = 0.1423]). No statistically significant difference in ORR was observed (48.8% vs. 56.5% [OR, 0.71; 95% CI 0.44–1.15; p = 0.1675], respectively). Sensitivity analyses produced consistent results, supporting the robustness of the base-case findings.Conclusions This exploratory analysis found no statistically significant differences in PFS or ORR between tislelizumab + CAPOX and tislelizumab + CAPOX or FOLFOX. Although median PFS was numerically longer with the mixed chemotherapy backbone, these findings are exploratory in nature and warrant further investigation.Clinical trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, RATIONALE-305 (NCT03777657); DisTinGuish (NCT04363801)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Medical Research and Opinion
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2026.2686048
Primary Topic
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative efficacy of tislelizumab + FOLFOX or CAPOX for gastric/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: an exploratory matching-adjusted indirect comparison

Jong Gwang Kim, Keun-Wook Lee, Sheng Xu, Min-Hee Ryu et al.
Current Medical Research and Opinion
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
article

Comparative efficacy of tislelizumab + FOLFOX or CAPOX for gastric/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: an exploratory matching-adjusted indirect comparison

Jong Gwang Kim, Keun-Wook Lee, Sheng Xu, Min-Hee Ryu, Sun Young Rha, Yaling Xu
article en

Abstract

Objective In the RATIONALE-305 trial, first-line tislelizumab + chemotherapy (CAPOX ([capecitabine + oxaliplatin] or 5-fluorouracil [5-FU] + cisplatin) significantly improved overall and progression-free survival (PFS) versus placebo + chemotherapy in unresectable or metastatic human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer (GC/GEJC). This exploratory analysis evaluated the comparative efficacy of tislelizumab + CAPOX versus tislelizumab + CAPOX or FOLFOX (5-FU, leucovorin, oxaliplatin) using a matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) approach.Methods An unanchored MAIC was performed, weighting individual patient data from RATIONALE-305 (tislelizumab + CAPOX) to match the DisTinGuish Part C (tislelizumab + CAPOX or tislelizumab + FOLFOX) aggregate population. After matching, hazard ratios (HRs) for PFS and odds ratios (ORs) for objective response rate (ORR) were calculated in base-case and sensitivity analyses.Results Baseline characteristics were well balanced post-matching (i.e. weighting). In the base case, compared with tislelizumab + CAPOX, median PFS was numerically longer with tislelizumab + CAPOX or tislelizumab + FOLFOX (7.2 vs. 10.5 months [HR 1.24; 95% CI 0.93–1.65; p = 0.1423]). No statistically significant difference in ORR was observed (48.8% vs. 56.5% [OR, 0.71; 95% CI 0.44–1.15; p = 0.1675], respectively). Sensitivity analyses produced consistent results, supporting the robustness of the base-case findings.Conclusions This exploratory analysis found no statistically significant differences in PFS or ORR between tislelizumab + CAPOX and tislelizumab + CAPOX or FOLFOX. Although median PFS was numerically longer with the mixed chemotherapy backbone, these findings are exploratory in nature and warrant further investigation.Clinical trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, RATIONALE-305 (NCT03777657); DisTinGuish (NCT04363801)

Current Medical Research and Opinion
Ulsan College (KR), Yonsei University (KR), Asan Medical Center (KR), New Generation University College (ET), Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (KR), Kyungpook National University (KR), University of Ulsan (KR), National University College (PR), Clinical Solutions (US), Data One Global (United States) (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.