Towards Dynamic Carbon Management: A Structured Analytical Review and Multi-Scale Framework for Urban Carbon Accounting

As cities increasingly become central arenas for achieving climate mitigation and carbon neutrality targets, the capacity to actively manage urban carbon rather than merely quantify emissions has emerged as a critical challenge for urban planning, design, and environmental governance. Despite substantial advances in quantifying urban emissions, existing studies frequently exhibit fragmented treatment of urban carbon processes, limited coupling across spatial scales, and insufficient integration of carbon storage and sequestration mechanisms, particularly those associated with nature-based solutions. These limitations constrain the capacity of urban planning and design to engage with carbon as a dynamic and spatially embedded urban system. This study aims to address these challenges through a structured analytical review of urban carbon research, employing an adapted PRISMA-informed protocol combined with process- oriented and scale-sensitive coding to systematically examine how carbon generation, accounting, storage, sequestration, and mitigation are conceptualised and operationalised in the literature. Comparative synthesis of the reviewed literature reveals persistent methodological and conceptual patterns, including the dominance of emission-centric accounting logics, the marginalisation of ecological and biogenic carbon processes, weak cross-scale integration between buildings and urban systems, and a prevailing reliance on static representations of carbon dynamics. Building on this analytical synthesis, the paper introduces Dynamic Carbon Management (DCM) as a conceptual framework that reframes urban carbon as an integrated, multi-process, and multi-scale system requiring coordinated management rather than isolated accounting. DCM framework formally links carbon flows across buildings, urban form, and nature-based interventions, providing an operational logic for understanding interactions between carbon generation, mitigation, storage, and sequestration over time. By shifting the analytical focus from static inventories toward dynamic management perspectives, this study contributes a theoretically grounded framework that advances urban carbon research and establishes a foundation for future empirical validation, modelling efforts, and policy-oriented applications aimed at supporting more adaptive, integrated, and multi-scale urban decarbonisation strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Urban and Building Science
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53941/ubs.2026.100016
Primary Topic
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards Dynamic Carbon Management: A Structured Analytical Review and Multi-Scale Framework for Urban Carbon Accounting

Akram Ahmed Noman Alabsi, Auwalu Faisal Koko, Khaled Mohammed Alshareem, Ahmed Abdurabu Ali Al-Nehmi
Urban and Building Science
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
article

Towards Dynamic Carbon Management: A Structured Analytical Review and Multi-Scale Framework for Urban Carbon Accounting

Akram Ahmed Noman Alabsi, Auwalu Faisal Koko, Khaled Mohammed Alshareem, Ahmed Abdurabu Ali Al-Nehmi
article en

Abstract

As cities increasingly become central arenas for achieving climate mitigation and carbon neutrality targets, the capacity to actively manage urban carbon rather than merely quantify emissions has emerged as a critical challenge for urban planning, design, and environmental governance. Despite substantial advances in quantifying urban emissions, existing studies frequently exhibit fragmented treatment of urban carbon processes, limited coupling across spatial scales, and insufficient integration of carbon storage and sequestration mechanisms, particularly those associated with nature-based solutions. These limitations constrain the capacity of urban planning and design to engage with carbon as a dynamic and spatially embedded urban system. This study aims to address these challenges through a structured analytical review of urban carbon research, employing an adapted PRISMA-informed protocol combined with process- oriented and scale-sensitive coding to systematically examine how carbon generation, accounting, storage, sequestration, and mitigation are conceptualised and operationalised in the literature. Comparative synthesis of the reviewed literature reveals persistent methodological and conceptual patterns, including the dominance of emission-centric accounting logics, the marginalisation of ecological and biogenic carbon processes, weak cross-scale integration between buildings and urban systems, and a prevailing reliance on static representations of carbon dynamics. Building on this analytical synthesis, the paper introduces Dynamic Carbon Management (DCM) as a conceptual framework that reframes urban carbon as an integrated, multi-process, and multi-scale system requiring coordinated management rather than isolated accounting. DCM framework formally links carbon flows across buildings, urban form, and nature-based interventions, providing an operational logic for understanding interactions between carbon generation, mitigation, storage, and sequestration over time. By shifting the analytical focus from static inventories toward dynamic management perspectives, this study contributes a theoretically grounded framework that advances urban carbon research and establishes a foundation for future empirical validation, modelling efforts, and policy-oriented applications aimed at supporting more adaptive, integrated, and multi-scale urban decarbonisation strategies.

Urban and Building Science
Thamar University (YE), Baze University (NG), Fujian University of Technology (CN)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.