Questioning Personalised Health: Limitations of Interpreting Wearable Data at the Individual Level

Wearable technologies are increasingly used to support personalised health management and promote health-related behaviours. These devices generate continuous, real-time data that are often interpreted as individualised health information. However, the key issue is not only data accuracy, but whether wearable-derived metrics are valid at the individual level or truly reflect personalisation. While wearable data may appear precise, their interpretation is limited by measurement variability, lack of contextualisation, and reliance on population-based models. This paper introduces the concept of the illusion of personalisation to describe the discrepancy between the apparent specificity of wearable-derived data and their limited individual-level interpretability. Data alone do not create meaning, and additional data do not necessarily improve clarity. In health promotion and preventive medicine, uncritical interpretation of wearable data may overestimate their clinical relevance. A cautious approach is therefore warranted, recognising wearable data as indicators of general trends rather than definitive representations of individual health.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Daehan imsang geon-gang jeungjin hakoeji/Daehan imsang geon'gang jeungjin haghoeji
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15384/kjhp.2026.00255
Primary Topic
Digital Mental Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Questioning Personalised Health: Limitations of Interpreting Wearable Data at the Individual Level

Jun Kwon
Daehan imsang geon-gang jeungjin hakoeji/Daehan imsang geon'gang jeungjin haghoeji
Digital Mental Health Interventions
article

Questioning Personalised Health: Limitations of Interpreting Wearable Data at the Individual Level

Jun Kwon
article en

Abstract

Wearable technologies are increasingly used to support personalised health management and promote health-related behaviours. These devices generate continuous, real-time data that are often interpreted as individualised health information. However, the key issue is not only data accuracy, but whether wearable-derived metrics are valid at the individual level or truly reflect personalisation. While wearable data may appear precise, their interpretation is limited by measurement variability, lack of contextualisation, and reliance on population-based models. This paper introduces the concept of the illusion of personalisation to describe the discrepancy between the apparent specificity of wearable-derived data and their limited individual-level interpretability. Data alone do not create meaning, and additional data do not necessarily improve clarity. In health promotion and preventive medicine, uncritical interpretation of wearable data may overestimate their clinical relevance. A cautious approach is therefore warranted, recognising wearable data as indicators of general trends rather than definitive representations of individual health.

Daehan imsang geon-gang jeungjin hakoeji/Daehan imsang geon'gang jeungjin haghoejiVol. 26(2)
Seoul National University of Education (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Digital Mental Health Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.