The experience of individuals following non-surgical management of Achilles tendon rupture in the United Kingdom – a qualitative study

OBJECTIVES: Despite extensive research on Achilles tendon ruptures (ATR), the lived experience of patients remains under explored. This study aimed to investigate the experiences of individuals managed non-surgically within the National Health Service (NHS). DESIGN: Qualitative study using semi-structured, one-to-one interviews. SETTING: NHS services in the United Kingdom providing non-surgical management for ATR. PARTICIPANTS: Fifteen patients (mean age 54.5 years) who had sustained an ATR and were managed non-surgically. Participants were recruited from a specialist ATR clinic. METHODS: A stakeholder-informed topic guide was used to conduct semi-structured interviews. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Coding was undertaken independently by two researchers, with themes reviewed by the full research team. The study followed COREQ guidelines for qualitative reporting. RESULTS: Three themes were identified: (1) The experience of injury and entering the healthcare system: 'it felt as if my whole ankle had exploded' participants described sudden injury onset, sometimes painless, and varied understanding of treatment options; (2) The experience of non-surgical immobilisation: 'you're being told so much in that first session…I just couldn't remember' boot immobilisation was valued for mobility but challenged comfort and self-management; and (3) The rehabilitation journey: 'it happened so unexpectedly so it can happen again' fear and uncertainty about rehabilitation and returning to sport were common, shaping participant's rehabilitation experience. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights how diverse ATR injury experiences, early management variability, and boot-related challenges impact recovery. Fear of re-rupture shapes rehabilitation and return to sport, emphasising the need for clearer guidance on boot use, weightbearing, and rehabilitation progression, alongside consistent healthcare professional support to optimise outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0352761
Primary Topic
Tendon Structure and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The experience of individuals following non-surgical management of Achilles tendon rupture in the United Kingdom – a qualitative study

Seth O’Neill, Jitendra Mangwani, Maneesh Bhatia, Samuel Briggs‐Price et al.
PLoS ONE
Tendon Structure and Treatment
article

The experience of individuals following non-surgical management of Achilles tendon rupture in the United Kingdom – a qualitative study

Seth O’Neill, Jitendra Mangwani, Maneesh Bhatia, Samuel Briggs‐Price, Tom Yates
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Despite extensive research on Achilles tendon ruptures (ATR), the lived experience of patients remains under explored. This study aimed to investigate the experiences of individuals managed non-surgically within the National Health Service (NHS). DESIGN: Qualitative study using semi-structured, one-to-one interviews. SETTING: NHS services in the United Kingdom providing non-surgical management for ATR. PARTICIPANTS: Fifteen patients (mean age 54.5 years) who had sustained an ATR and were managed non-surgically. Participants were recruited from a specialist ATR clinic. METHODS: A stakeholder-informed topic guide was used to conduct semi-structured interviews. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Coding was undertaken independently by two researchers, with themes reviewed by the full research team. The study followed COREQ guidelines for qualitative reporting. RESULTS: Three themes were identified: (1) The experience of injury and entering the healthcare system: 'it felt as if my whole ankle had exploded' participants described sudden injury onset, sometimes painless, and varied understanding of treatment options; (2) The experience of non-surgical immobilisation: 'you're being told so much in that first session…I just couldn't remember' boot immobilisation was valued for mobility but challenged comfort and self-management; and (3) The rehabilitation journey: 'it happened so unexpectedly so it can happen again' fear and uncertainty about rehabilitation and returning to sport were common, shaping participant's rehabilitation experience. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights how diverse ATR injury experiences, early management variability, and boot-related challenges impact recovery. Fear of re-rupture shapes rehabilitation and return to sport, emphasising the need for clearer guidance on boot use, weightbearing, and rehabilitation progression, alongside consistent healthcare professional support to optimise outcomes.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(6)
University of Leicester (GB), University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust (GB)
University of Leicester
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Tendon Structure and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.