Intersectional deprivation: refugee women's entrepreneurship in a UK deprived context

Purpose This paper introduces the concept of intersectional deprivation to explain how overlapping structural, psychological and relational disadvantages shape refugee women's entrepreneurial intentions in deprived UK contexts. Drawing on Crenshaw's intersectionality and place-based marginalization, the study addresses the absence of an integrated mechanism-based framework by focusing on Middlesbrough, a paradigmatic asylum-dispersal city in the North East of England, shaped by austerity, immigration policy and spatial stigma. Design/methodology/approach The study adopts a co-production methodology and an interpretive case-study design. Data were generated through fifteen semi-structured interviews, focus groups and storytelling workshops with refugee women. Analysis followed Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic approach, incorporating iterative coding, memo writing, participant feedback and constant comparison to ensure theoretical depth, credibility and epistemic justice. Findings The analysis identifies three mutually reinforcing mechanisms of intersectional deprivation: (1) psychological erosion, where trauma, uncertainty, language barriers and caregiving responsibilities undermine self-efficacy; (2) structural and institutional inertia, including bureaucratic opacity, credential devaluation, fragmented support systems and financial exclusion; and (3) relational load and collective coping, where community-based networks provide emotional and material support while simultaneously reproducing unpaid care work and limiting access to formal entrepreneurial ecosystems. These mechanisms form a cyclical process that both constrains and generates situated, collective forms of agency. Originality/value The study offers a novel mechanism-based framework that extends the 5 M model, Mixed Embeddedness and epistemic-injustice perspectives by integrating intersectionality with spatial deprivation and psychological experiences of exclusion. It centres refugee women's lived experiences through co-production and provides actionable insights for policy, ecosystem development and gender-just entrepreneurship support in overlooked UK regions and comparable international contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijge-03-2024-0088
Primary Topic
Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intersectional deprivation: refugee women's entrepreneurship in a UK deprived context

Judith Eberhardt, Damilola Joseph, Tarela Ike
International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship
Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy
article

Intersectional deprivation: refugee women's entrepreneurship in a UK deprived context

Judith Eberhardt, Damilola Joseph, Tarela Ike
article en

Abstract

Purpose This paper introduces the concept of intersectional deprivation to explain how overlapping structural, psychological and relational disadvantages shape refugee women's entrepreneurial intentions in deprived UK contexts. Drawing on Crenshaw's intersectionality and place-based marginalization, the study addresses the absence of an integrated mechanism-based framework by focusing on Middlesbrough, a paradigmatic asylum-dispersal city in the North East of England, shaped by austerity, immigration policy and spatial stigma. Design/methodology/approach The study adopts a co-production methodology and an interpretive case-study design. Data were generated through fifteen semi-structured interviews, focus groups and storytelling workshops with refugee women. Analysis followed Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic approach, incorporating iterative coding, memo writing, participant feedback and constant comparison to ensure theoretical depth, credibility and epistemic justice. Findings The analysis identifies three mutually reinforcing mechanisms of intersectional deprivation: (1) psychological erosion, where trauma, uncertainty, language barriers and caregiving responsibilities undermine self-efficacy; (2) structural and institutional inertia, including bureaucratic opacity, credential devaluation, fragmented support systems and financial exclusion; and (3) relational load and collective coping, where community-based networks provide emotional and material support while simultaneously reproducing unpaid care work and limiting access to formal entrepreneurial ecosystems. These mechanisms form a cyclical process that both constrains and generates situated, collective forms of agency. Originality/value The study offers a novel mechanism-based framework that extends the 5 M model, Mixed Embeddedness and epistemic-injustice perspectives by integrating intersectionality with spatial deprivation and psychological experiences of exclusion. It centres refugee women's lived experiences through co-production and provides actionable insights for policy, ecosystem development and gender-just entrepreneurship support in overlooked UK regions and comparable international contexts.

International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship
Teesside University (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.