Training humans to detect AI-generated faces

As AI-generated faces become indistinguishable from real ones, deepfake technology poses escalating threats to information integrity and security. While algorithms can detect deepfakes, they suffer from opacity and critical vulnerabilities—and training humans to identify specific visual artifacts has proven largely ineffective. Here, we introduce a fundamentally different approach that harnesses people’s global impressions of faces. Building on findings that AI and human faces evoke systematically different perceptual impressions (Miller et al., 2023), we trained participants to attend to these distinguishing qualities without explicit instruction on how to use them. Using a rigorous pre–post design with untrained test faces, we demonstrate that all participants ( N = 45) improved, with mean accuracy nearly doubling. High performers achieved near-perfect detection, and participants developed metacognitive insight, showing appropriate confidence calibration only after training. A test–retest control study ruled out practice effects as an explanation for training gains, and an online replication demonstrates the scalability of our approach. As the technology advances, targeting systematic biases that are inherent to generative AI, and which manifest in global features, may offer a more durable defense than approaches reliant on image artifacts alone.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2602122123
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Face Recognition and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.27

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Training humans to detect AI-generated faces

James W. Tanaka, Tanya George, James D. Dunn, Amy Dawel et al.
1 citations
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Face Recognition and Perception
11.27
article

Training humans to detect AI-generated faces

James W. Tanaka, Tanya George, James D. Dunn, Amy Dawel, Clare Sutherland, Eric Y. Mah, Nick Argument
article en
1 citations

Abstract

As AI-generated faces become indistinguishable from real ones, deepfake technology poses escalating threats to information integrity and security. While algorithms can detect deepfakes, they suffer from opacity and critical vulnerabilities—and training humans to identify specific visual artifacts has proven largely ineffective. Here, we introduce a fundamentally different approach that harnesses people’s global impressions of faces. Building on findings that AI and human faces evoke systematically different perceptual impressions (Miller et al., 2023), we trained participants to attend to these distinguishing qualities without explicit instruction on how to use them. Using a rigorous pre–post design with untrained test faces, we demonstrate that all participants ( N = 45) improved, with mean accuracy nearly doubling. High performers achieved near-perfect detection, and participants developed metacognitive insight, showing appropriate confidence calibration only after training. A test–retest control study ruled out practice effects as an explanation for training gains, and an online replication demonstrates the scalability of our approach. As the technology advances, targeting systematic biases that are inherent to generative AI, and which manifest in global features, may offer a more durable defense than approaches reliant on image artifacts alone.

Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesVol. 123(27)
Australian National University (AU), The University of Western Australia (AU), University of Aberdeen (GB), University of Victoria (CA), UNSW Sydney (AU)
Australian Research Council
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Face Recognition and Perception
11.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.