Towards a New Italian Secular and European Bioethics: Criteria, Models, and an Operational Proposal

Italian bioethics emerged as an extension of academic moral philosophy rather than as a clinical practice. The delegation of ethical governance to moral philosophers, combined with the importation of American principlism and the persistence of Catholic anthropology, produced an abstract and ideologically polarized model that is poorly aligned with the realities of clinical practice. In contrast, European bioethics developed as a prudential and contextual practice rooted in clinical work, palliative medicine, therapeutic proportionality, and relational responsibility. Germany, France, Switzerland, Austria, and Scandinavia offer mature models of clinical bioethics grounded in Aristotelian phronesis, shared responsibility, and a cultural understanding of human limits. This article proposes the criteria for a new Italian secular and European bioethics capable of restoring ethical governance to clinicians, integrating palliative care as an autonomous discipline, and grounding clinical decision-making in measure, prudence, and relationality. An operational roadmap for the next decade is outlined, aimed at building an Italian bioethics finally rooted in clinical practice and in the European culture of limits.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21028118
Primary Topic
Ethics in medical practice
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Towards a New Italian Secular and European Bioethics: Criteria, Models, and an Operational Proposal

Luciano Lamarca
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics in medical practice
preprint

Towards a New Italian Secular and European Bioethics: Criteria, Models, and an Operational Proposal

Luciano Lamarca
preprint en

Abstract

Italian bioethics emerged as an extension of academic moral philosophy rather than as a clinical practice. The delegation of ethical governance to moral philosophers, combined with the importation of American principlism and the persistence of Catholic anthropology, produced an abstract and ideologically polarized model that is poorly aligned with the realities of clinical practice. In contrast, European bioethics developed as a prudential and contextual practice rooted in clinical work, palliative medicine, therapeutic proportionality, and relational responsibility. Germany, France, Switzerland, Austria, and Scandinavia offer mature models of clinical bioethics grounded in Aristotelian phronesis, shared responsibility, and a cultural understanding of human limits. This article proposes the criteria for a new Italian secular and European bioethics capable of restoring ethical governance to clinicians, integrating palliative care as an autonomous discipline, and grounding clinical decision-making in measure, prudence, and relationality. An operational roadmap for the next decade is outlined, aimed at building an Italian bioethics finally rooted in clinical practice and in the European culture of limits.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Ethics in medical practice
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.