Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System: Reliability and Dosage of Common Ingredients in Standard-of-Care Therapy for Vocal Hyperfunction

PURPOSE: The Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System (RTSS) is a theory-driven framework for identifying the active ingredients of rehabilitation treatments and was used to create standard labels in voice therapy (RTSS-Voice). The RTSS and RTSS-Voice have high validity, but reliability has not been tested. This study evaluated if RTSS-Voice ingredients can be reliably coded in standard-of-care voice therapy videos and used to identify commonalities and differences in ingredient dosage across five expert voice clinicians from different institutions. METHOD: Five speech-language pathologists from different institutions videotaped one voice therapy session for 36 patients with vocal hyperfunction. Two trained graduate students coded sessions using four RTSS-Voice ingredients: (a) opportunities to practice voicing, (b) feedback, (c) volition ingredients, and (d) vocal hygiene information. Twelve sessions were double coded for interrater reliability. RESULTS: Practice voicing codes achieved strong to almost perfect reliability (κs: .80-.95), while informational codes achieved moderate-to-strong reliability (κs: .61-.87). All clinicians spent more time on volition ingredients (14-34 min/52.4%-65.7% of the session) compared to practice voicing (3-8 min/6.3%-23.3% of the session) and feedback (3-11 min/10.8%-19.1% of the session). For practice voicing, clinicians incorporated modified airflow and resonance into over 70% of their practice and spent more time in nonspeech and structured speech compared to spontaneous speech practice. Clinicians differed in delivering volitional information and feedback directly versus indirectly. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple RTSS-Voice ingredients were reliable across raters, indicating that, with appropriate training, these are readily observable clinician actions that can aid in the study of dosage in voice therapy. The RTSS and RTSS-Voice also identified commonalities and differences in ingredient usage across multiple expert clinicians. Future work could use the RTSS and RTSS-Voice to investigate relationships between variations in therapy ingredients and individual patient outcomes. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.32785938.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1044/2026_ajslp-25-00455
Primary Topic
Voice and Speech Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System: Reliability and Dosage of Common Ingredients in Standard-of-Care Therapy for Vocal Hyperfunction

Carol Jorgensen Tolejano, Jason Muise, John Whyte, Jarrad H. Van Stan et al.
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
Voice and Speech Disorders
article

Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System: Reliability and Dosage of Common Ingredients in Standard-of-Care Therapy for Vocal Hyperfunction

Carol Jorgensen Tolejano, Jason Muise, John Whyte, Jarrad H. Van Stan, Jeremy Wolfberg, Sofia Vallila‐Rohter, Shirley Gherson, Robert E. Hillman, Patricia Doyle, Meghan Ward, Caroline Raymond, Brian Petty
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: The Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System (RTSS) is a theory-driven framework for identifying the active ingredients of rehabilitation treatments and was used to create standard labels in voice therapy (RTSS-Voice). The RTSS and RTSS-Voice have high validity, but reliability has not been tested. This study evaluated if RTSS-Voice ingredients can be reliably coded in standard-of-care voice therapy videos and used to identify commonalities and differences in ingredient dosage across five expert voice clinicians from different institutions. METHOD: Five speech-language pathologists from different institutions videotaped one voice therapy session for 36 patients with vocal hyperfunction. Two trained graduate students coded sessions using four RTSS-Voice ingredients: (a) opportunities to practice voicing, (b) feedback, (c) volition ingredients, and (d) vocal hygiene information. Twelve sessions were double coded for interrater reliability. RESULTS: Practice voicing codes achieved strong to almost perfect reliability (κs: .80-.95), while informational codes achieved moderate-to-strong reliability (κs: .61-.87). All clinicians spent more time on volition ingredients (14-34 min/52.4%-65.7% of the session) compared to practice voicing (3-8 min/6.3%-23.3% of the session) and feedback (3-11 min/10.8%-19.1% of the session). For practice voicing, clinicians incorporated modified airflow and resonance into over 70% of their practice and spent more time in nonspeech and structured speech compared to spontaneous speech practice. Clinicians differed in delivering volitional information and feedback directly versus indirectly. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple RTSS-Voice ingredients were reliable across raters, indicating that, with appropriate training, these are readily observable clinician actions that can aid in the study of dosage in voice therapy. The RTSS and RTSS-Voice also identified commonalities and differences in ingredient usage across multiple expert clinicians. Future work could use the RTSS and RTSS-Voice to investigate relationships between variations in therapy ingredients and individual patient outcomes. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.32785938.

American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Harvard University (US), University of Connecticut (US), Emory University (US), MGH Institute of Health Professions (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Moss Rehabilitation Hospital (US), New York University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Voice and Speech Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.