Actions matter: Mental models of allies & accomplices in librarianship

Diversity as it relates to discrimination, race and ethnicity is experiencing challenges in today’s society, and the terms “ally” and “accomplice” are used as part of the broader conversation about how society supports social justice for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). People are comfortable being an ally, supporting marginalized people without getting too involved or experiencing any trouble with their own life or profession, but less comfortable being an accomplice, fighting against injustices even though their life and profession may be at stake. To better understand how librarians and information professionals perceive allies and accomplices, this research study explored the mental models of librarians as it relates to allies and accomplices as part of a larger study that looked at librarian experiences with microaggression, discrimination, racism, and tools/strategies that can help librarians with daily challenges. Using a mixed-methods approach that included a survey and semi-structured interviews conducted via Zoom with participants across the United States and internationally, the study gathered insights from librarians and information professionals about their perceptions and experiences with allies and accomplices. Thematic analysis was used to analyze qualitative data and the major finding was 10 mental models of allies and accomplices. Mental models provide a framework to investigate librarians and information professionals’ understanding of allies and accomplices. The research also highlighted the role of microaggression in the daily life of librarians and information professionals, and the need for tools and strategies to help librarians and information professionals deal with the daily challenges.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Librarianship and Information Science
Published
2026-06-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006261454000
Primary Topic
Library Science and Administration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Actions matter: Mental models of allies & accomplices in librarianship

Simone L. Yearwood, Robin Naughton
Journal of Librarianship and Information Science
Library Science and Administration
article

Actions matter: Mental models of allies & accomplices in librarianship

Simone L. Yearwood, Robin Naughton
article en

Abstract

Diversity as it relates to discrimination, race and ethnicity is experiencing challenges in today’s society, and the terms “ally” and “accomplice” are used as part of the broader conversation about how society supports social justice for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). People are comfortable being an ally, supporting marginalized people without getting too involved or experiencing any trouble with their own life or profession, but less comfortable being an accomplice, fighting against injustices even though their life and profession may be at stake. To better understand how librarians and information professionals perceive allies and accomplices, this research study explored the mental models of librarians as it relates to allies and accomplices as part of a larger study that looked at librarian experiences with microaggression, discrimination, racism, and tools/strategies that can help librarians with daily challenges. Using a mixed-methods approach that included a survey and semi-structured interviews conducted via Zoom with participants across the United States and internationally, the study gathered insights from librarians and information professionals about their perceptions and experiences with allies and accomplices. Thematic analysis was used to analyze qualitative data and the major finding was 10 mental models of allies and accomplices. Mental models provide a framework to investigate librarians and information professionals’ understanding of allies and accomplices. The research also highlighted the role of microaggression in the daily life of librarians and information professionals, and the need for tools and strategies to help librarians and information professionals deal with the daily challenges.

Journal of Librarianship and Information Science
Queens College, CUNY (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Library Science and Administration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.