Clinical Outcomes of Pola-R-CHP Therapy in Patients Aged >80 Years With Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

<h3>Background/Aim:</h3> Polatuzumab vedotin, rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone (Pola-R-CHP) therapy has become a frontline treatment for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), although evidence from patients aged &gt;80 years remains limited. This study evaluated the real-world efficacy and safety of Pola-R-CHP therapy in patients older than 80 years. <h3>Patients and Methods:</h3> We retrospectively analyzed 65 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL who received Pola-R-CHP as first-line therapy. Patients were stratified by age into those ≤80 years (n=49) and &gt;80 years (n=16). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), objective response rate (ORR), complete response rate (CRR), and safety. Dose intensity and adverse events were evaluated and compared between groups. <h3>Results:</h3> Patients aged &gt;80 years received significantly lower dose intensities of cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin, whereas polatuzumab vedotin was administered at near-full dose intensity. Age &gt;80 years was not independently associated with inferior PFS, OS, or EFS [PFS: hazard ratio (HR)=0.44, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.10-1.94, <i>p</i>=0.28; OS: HR=0.82, 95%CI=0.17-3.88, <i>p</i>=0.80; EFS: HR=1.02, 95%CI=0.37-2.80, <i>p</i>=0.96]. ORR and CRR were comparable between the ≤80 and &gt;80 years groups (ORR: 85.7% <i>vs</i>. 93.8%, <i>p</i>=0.67; CRR: 79.6% <i>vs</i>. 75.0%, <i>p</i>=0.73). Hematologic toxicities and febrile neutropenia occurred frequently, yet were comparable between groups, with no treatment-related deaths observed. <h3>Conclusion:</h3> Pola-R-CHP therapy demonstrated efficacy and acceptable safety in patients &gt;80 years with newly diagnosed DLBCL. With appropriate dose modification and supportive care, Pola-R-CHP therapy is a feasible frontline treatment for elderly patients in real-world clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Anticancer Research
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.18264
Primary Topic
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical Outcomes of Pola-R-CHP Therapy in Patients Aged >80 Years With Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Nobuyuki Kabasawa, Maasa Abe, N Maeda, Yuta Baba et al.
Anticancer Research
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Clinical Outcomes of Pola-R-CHP Therapy in Patients Aged >80 Years With Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Nobuyuki Kabasawa, Maasa Abe, N Maeda, Yuta Baba, Tetsuya Fukuda, Hirotaka Sakai, Yuka Shimada, SATOSHI FUKUMURA, SEIRA TANAI
article en

Abstract

<h3>Background/Aim:</h3> Polatuzumab vedotin, rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone (Pola-R-CHP) therapy has become a frontline treatment for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), although evidence from patients aged &gt;80 years remains limited. This study evaluated the real-world efficacy and safety of Pola-R-CHP therapy in patients older than 80 years. <h3>Patients and Methods:</h3> We retrospectively analyzed 65 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL who received Pola-R-CHP as first-line therapy. Patients were stratified by age into those ≤80 years (n=49) and &gt;80 years (n=16). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), objective response rate (ORR), complete response rate (CRR), and safety. Dose intensity and adverse events were evaluated and compared between groups. <h3>Results:</h3> Patients aged &gt;80 years received significantly lower dose intensities of cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin, whereas polatuzumab vedotin was administered at near-full dose intensity. Age &gt;80 years was not independently associated with inferior PFS, OS, or EFS [PFS: hazard ratio (HR)=0.44, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.10-1.94, <i>p</i>=0.28; OS: HR=0.82, 95%CI=0.17-3.88, <i>p</i>=0.80; EFS: HR=1.02, 95%CI=0.37-2.80, <i>p</i>=0.96]. ORR and CRR were comparable between the ≤80 and &gt;80 years groups (ORR: 85.7% <i>vs</i>. 93.8%, <i>p</i>=0.67; CRR: 79.6% <i>vs</i>. 75.0%, <i>p</i>=0.73). Hematologic toxicities and febrile neutropenia occurred frequently, yet were comparable between groups, with no treatment-related deaths observed. <h3>Conclusion:</h3> Pola-R-CHP therapy demonstrated efficacy and acceptable safety in patients &gt;80 years with newly diagnosed DLBCL. With appropriate dose modification and supportive care, Pola-R-CHP therapy is a feasible frontline treatment for elderly patients in real-world clinical practice.

Anticancer ResearchVol. 46(7)
SHOWA Medical University Fujigaoka Hospital (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.