Comparing apples with apples: the performance of state-and privately owned Chinese football clubs

Abstract An often-discussed topic in the literature on state capitalism is performance effects of state ownership, not least in China. However, in China analysis of performance is nearly impossible because the Chinese economy is bifurcated, with state-and privately owned enterprises operating in separate industries. Seeking a better basis for comparison, we therefore analyze the performance of state-owned Chinese football clubs. We furthermore test the mediating effect of resources on performance. This allows us to discriminate between some of the main theories of Chinese SOEs. We find a positive but insignificant direct performance effect of state ownership. However, mediation analyses suggest that Chinese state-owned clubs have fewer financial resources, which in turns negatively impacts their performance (relative to private firms). Our results challenge two commonly found assumptions in the literature, namely that, relative to private firms, Chinese SOEs have superior access to financial resources and that their corporate governance is weak.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Business & Management
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41291-026-00330-2
Primary Topic
Corporate Finance and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing apples with apples: the performance of state-and privately owned Chinese football clubs

Anders Ryom Villadsen, Jesper Wulff, Jakob Arnoldi
Asian Business & Management
Corporate Finance and Governance
article

Comparing apples with apples: the performance of state-and privately owned Chinese football clubs

Anders Ryom Villadsen, Jesper Wulff, Jakob Arnoldi
article en

Abstract

Abstract An often-discussed topic in the literature on state capitalism is performance effects of state ownership, not least in China. However, in China analysis of performance is nearly impossible because the Chinese economy is bifurcated, with state-and privately owned enterprises operating in separate industries. Seeking a better basis for comparison, we therefore analyze the performance of state-owned Chinese football clubs. We furthermore test the mediating effect of resources on performance. This allows us to discriminate between some of the main theories of Chinese SOEs. We find a positive but insignificant direct performance effect of state ownership. However, mediation analyses suggest that Chinese state-owned clubs have fewer financial resources, which in turns negatively impacts their performance (relative to private firms). Our results challenge two commonly found assumptions in the literature, namely that, relative to private firms, Chinese SOEs have superior access to financial resources and that their corporate governance is weak.

Asian Business & Management
Aarhus University (DK), Aarhus University Hospital (DK), Aarhus Business College (DK)
Aarhus Universitet
Peace, Justice and strong institutions, Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Corporate Finance and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.