Church of All Hallows, Gedling, Nottinghamshire: Archaeological Watching Brief

The watching brief was carried out by a professional archaeologist. All deposits were inspected in order to identify any archaeological remains of interest, in particular those of medieval or earlier date. These were cleaned by hand, examined and recorded. Recording of the groundworks included the position and depths of the deposits exposed by drawing (both in section and plan where applicable) and photograph. Prior to backfilling spoil heaps were inspected for any datable or significant archaeological artefacts. All identifiable deposits were given unique individual four digit context numbers e.g. 0001, 0002 etc. Context numbers started at 0001. All saved artefacts were given individual three letter finds codes e.g. AAA, AAB. Disarticulated human remains found in the confines of the work were recorded appropriately and left on site for reburial. Advice from the Archaeological Advisor to the Diocese of Southwell & Nottingham would be sought if articulated skeletons which required moving were present. Multi-period stratigraphy extending from the present to the medieval period survived within the north aisle. Of particular note a mortar deposit was encountered that may have been the base for a medieval tile pavement, possibly related to the find of a plain green-glazed medieval floor tile fragment found during archaeological work in 1993 (John Samuels Archaeological Consultants 1994). The complete absence of in-situ burials or other significant archaeological remains encountered during the trenching through the northern section of the churchyard is likely to be due to the limited scope of the work carried out which ensured that the destructive impact on the archaeology was minimal. In addition, the low number of grave markers, the earliest dating to 1831, suggests that it was little used for burial and developed at a later date compared to the south side of the churchyard.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Archaeology Data Service
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5284/1143924
Primary Topic
Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Church of All Hallows, Gedling, Nottinghamshire: Archaeological Watching Brief

M Hurford
Archaeology Data Service
Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
article

Church of All Hallows, Gedling, Nottinghamshire: Archaeological Watching Brief

M Hurford
article en

Abstract

The watching brief was carried out by a professional archaeologist. All deposits were inspected in order to identify any archaeological remains of interest, in particular those of medieval or earlier date. These were cleaned by hand, examined and recorded. Recording of the groundworks included the position and depths of the deposits exposed by drawing (both in section and plan where applicable) and photograph. Prior to backfilling spoil heaps were inspected for any datable or significant archaeological artefacts. All identifiable deposits were given unique individual four digit context numbers e.g. 0001, 0002 etc. Context numbers started at 0001. All saved artefacts were given individual three letter finds codes e.g. AAA, AAB. Disarticulated human remains found in the confines of the work were recorded appropriately and left on site for reburial. Advice from the Archaeological Advisor to the Diocese of Southwell & Nottingham would be sought if articulated skeletons which required moving were present. Multi-period stratigraphy extending from the present to the medieval period survived within the north aisle. Of particular note a mortar deposit was encountered that may have been the base for a medieval tile pavement, possibly related to the find of a plain green-glazed medieval floor tile fragment found during archaeological work in 1993 (John Samuels Archaeological Consultants 1994). The complete absence of in-situ burials or other significant archaeological remains encountered during the trenching through the northern section of the churchyard is likely to be due to the limited scope of the work carried out which ensured that the destructive impact on the archaeology was minimal. In addition, the low number of grave markers, the earliest dating to 1831, suggests that it was little used for burial and developed at a later date compared to the south side of the churchyard.

Archaeology Data Service
Historic England (GB)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.