Extended platelet rich fibrin versus allograft as a space filling material in immediate dental implant placement

BACKGROUND: Immediate implant has been one of the solutions to decrease bone resorption after tooth extraction. Gap distance between the dental implant and adjacent bone has undergone much research to enhance bone formation in this area. This is small exploratory study that aimed to compare the efficacy of extended platelet rich fibrin (e-PRF) a regenerative biomaterial produced by heating platelet-poor plasma (PPP) to denature albumin, extending the resorption time of standard PRF from 2 to 3 weeks to 4-6 months, as well as allograft as a space filling material in immediate dental implant placement. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight implants were placed for the prosthetic replacement of non-restorable single-rooted maxillary teeth using immediate implant placement. Patients were randomly allocated into two equal groups (n = 14 each). In Group I, allograft was placed in the peri-implant gap, whereas in Group II, e-PRF was used. Implant stability was assessed using resonance frequency analysis (RFA). Buccal bone thickness and marginal bone loss were evaluated using CBCT throughout the follow-up period. Statistical analysis was performed on all clinical and radiographic data. RESULTS: A total of 28 patients received 28 immediate implants in the maxillary esthetic zone. During the 12-month follow-up period, all implants were successful with no complications. No statistically significant differences were observed between the groups regarding implant stability, marginal bone loss, or buccal bone thickness. CONCLUSION: Within this small exploratory trial, no statistically significant intergroup differences were detected between e-PRF and allograft as space-filling materials around immediate implants regarding stability, marginal bone loss, and buccal bone thickness. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical-Trials.gov PRS ( https://register. CLINICALTRIALS: gov ) has this study registered under the identifier number. NCT07445776 on 03/02/2026.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Oral Health
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-026-08891-6
Primary Topic
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Extended platelet rich fibrin versus allograft as a space filling material in immediate dental implant placement

Mohamed Abdel-Monem Tawfik, Ayman A Yaseen, Nesma El-Gohary, Hala Mohammed Mohammed Ahmed Elnaggar
BMC Oral Health
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
article

Extended platelet rich fibrin versus allograft as a space filling material in immediate dental implant placement

Mohamed Abdel-Monem Tawfik, Ayman A Yaseen, Nesma El-Gohary, Hala Mohammed Mohammed Ahmed Elnaggar
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Immediate implant has been one of the solutions to decrease bone resorption after tooth extraction. Gap distance between the dental implant and adjacent bone has undergone much research to enhance bone formation in this area. This is small exploratory study that aimed to compare the efficacy of extended platelet rich fibrin (e-PRF) a regenerative biomaterial produced by heating platelet-poor plasma (PPP) to denature albumin, extending the resorption time of standard PRF from 2 to 3 weeks to 4-6 months, as well as allograft as a space filling material in immediate dental implant placement. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight implants were placed for the prosthetic replacement of non-restorable single-rooted maxillary teeth using immediate implant placement. Patients were randomly allocated into two equal groups (n = 14 each). In Group I, allograft was placed in the peri-implant gap, whereas in Group II, e-PRF was used. Implant stability was assessed using resonance frequency analysis (RFA). Buccal bone thickness and marginal bone loss were evaluated using CBCT throughout the follow-up period. Statistical analysis was performed on all clinical and radiographic data. RESULTS: A total of 28 patients received 28 immediate implants in the maxillary esthetic zone. During the 12-month follow-up period, all implants were successful with no complications. No statistically significant differences were observed between the groups regarding implant stability, marginal bone loss, or buccal bone thickness. CONCLUSION: Within this small exploratory trial, no statistically significant intergroup differences were detected between e-PRF and allograft as space-filling materials around immediate implants regarding stability, marginal bone loss, and buccal bone thickness. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical-Trials.gov PRS ( https://register. CLINICALTRIALS: gov ) has this study registered under the identifier number. NCT07445776 on 03/02/2026.

BMC Oral HealthVol. 26(1)
Mansoura University (EG)
Science and Technology Development Fund, Mansoura University
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.