Using functional analysis for product decomposition in engineering design: insights from a literature review

Abstract Functional Analysis supports product decomposition in the conceptual design phase by defining system functions and flows before committing to specific solutions and technical implementation. Although widely recognized, Functional Analysis practice remains fragmented, with varied methodologies, inconsistent terminology, and limited software support. This study presents a Systematic Literature Review of Functional Analysis applications in engineering design, screening six databases using the PICOC framework and PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Forty peer-reviewed papers were analyzed to identify dominant methods, inputs, outputs, tool usage, application domains, and selection criteria. Results show four main approaches widely adopted in engineering design: Black Box models, Function–Means Trees, Systems Architectures, and hybrid methods. Typical inputs include design requirements, interface characteristics, and customer needs; outputs are mainly flow diagrams, hierarchical decompositions, and systems architectures. Only 20% of studies used dedicated Functional Analysis software, with most relying on general-purpose tools or custom prototypes. Functional Analysis is most common in mechanical and mechatronic systems, with limited adoption in biomedical, aerospace, and naval engineering fields. Key challenges involve scalability, repeatability, cross-disciplinary integration, and balancing systematicity with creativity. An exploratory, literature-informed framework is proposed, linking complexity, detail, usability, and systematicity to the comparative discussion of method choice, supporting comparative interpretation and exploratory method selection for researchers and practitioners and identifying opportunities for advancing Functional Analysis in high-complexity systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research in Engineering Design
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-026-00492-2
Primary Topic
Product Development and Customization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using functional analysis for product decomposition in engineering design: insights from a literature review

Claudio Favi, Gabriel Araujo De Lima, Rachele Rizzioli, Davide Berzieri
Research in Engineering Design
Product Development and Customization
article

Using functional analysis for product decomposition in engineering design: insights from a literature review

Claudio Favi, Gabriel Araujo De Lima, Rachele Rizzioli, Davide Berzieri
article en

Abstract

Abstract Functional Analysis supports product decomposition in the conceptual design phase by defining system functions and flows before committing to specific solutions and technical implementation. Although widely recognized, Functional Analysis practice remains fragmented, with varied methodologies, inconsistent terminology, and limited software support. This study presents a Systematic Literature Review of Functional Analysis applications in engineering design, screening six databases using the PICOC framework and PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Forty peer-reviewed papers were analyzed to identify dominant methods, inputs, outputs, tool usage, application domains, and selection criteria. Results show four main approaches widely adopted in engineering design: Black Box models, Function–Means Trees, Systems Architectures, and hybrid methods. Typical inputs include design requirements, interface characteristics, and customer needs; outputs are mainly flow diagrams, hierarchical decompositions, and systems architectures. Only 20% of studies used dedicated Functional Analysis software, with most relying on general-purpose tools or custom prototypes. Functional Analysis is most common in mechanical and mechatronic systems, with limited adoption in biomedical, aerospace, and naval engineering fields. Key challenges involve scalability, repeatability, cross-disciplinary integration, and balancing systematicity with creativity. An exploratory, literature-informed framework is proposed, linking complexity, detail, usability, and systematicity to the comparative discussion of method choice, supporting comparative interpretation and exploratory method selection for researchers and practitioners and identifying opportunities for advancing Functional Analysis in high-complexity systems.

Research in Engineering DesignVol. 37(3)
University of Parma (IT)
Università degli Studi di Parma
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Product Development and Customization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.