Effects of concentrated growth factor and platelet-rich plasma on postoperative pain and edema following impacted mandibular third molar surgery: a randomized controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of concentrated growth factor (CGF) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) on postoperative pain and edema following impacted mandibular third molar surgery, and to investigate postoperative complications. METHODS: This prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial included a total of 42 patients divided into three groups: control, CGF, and PRP (n = 14 per group). Pain was evaluated using a 10-cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and edema was assessed using standard linear facial measurements on postoperative days 1, 3, and 7. Changes over time and differences between groups were analyzed using Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE). RESULTS: According to the GEE analysis, both CGF and PRP applications demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in facial edema (tragus-pogonion) compared to the control group; however, the absolute reduction was minimal (0.2-0.5 mm) and likely of limited clinical significance. These applications appear to be effective in edema control following mandibular third molar surgery (CGF: B=-1.056, 95% CI [-1.835, -0.276], p = 0.008; PRP: B=-1.002, 95% CI [-1.750, -0.254], p = 0.009). However, the clinical magnitude of the differences between the groups remained limited. Although pain scores were lower in the CGF group, they did not show a statistically significant difference between the groups. The healing process was completed uneventfully in all groups, and no alveolar osteitis or serious postoperative complications were observed in any patient during the study. CONCLUSIONS: While CGF and PRP applications provided a statistically significant reduction in facial edema following impacted tooth surgery, the minimal magnitude of this reduction suggests it is unlikely to meaningfully improve the patient's postoperative quality of life. Furthermore, their effects on postoperative pain and complications did not offer an additional clinical advantage compared to a standard and atraumatic surgical procedure. Therefore, case-based evaluation is recommended rather than the routine use of these biomaterials. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered retrospectively at ClinicalTrials.gov under the number NCT07320170 on January 06, 2026. Although patient recruitment and data collection began prior to registration due to an initial oversight, the study protocol, including primary and secondary outcome variables and the statistical analysis plan, was established before recruitment commenced, and no changes were made following data collection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Oral Health
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-026-09054-3
Primary Topic
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of concentrated growth factor and platelet-rich plasma on postoperative pain and edema following impacted mandibular third molar surgery: a randomized controlled clinical trial

Andaç Doğan, Emin Valiyev
BMC Oral Health
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
article

Effects of concentrated growth factor and platelet-rich plasma on postoperative pain and edema following impacted mandibular third molar surgery: a randomized controlled clinical trial

Andaç Doğan, Emin Valiyev
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of concentrated growth factor (CGF) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) on postoperative pain and edema following impacted mandibular third molar surgery, and to investigate postoperative complications. METHODS: This prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial included a total of 42 patients divided into three groups: control, CGF, and PRP (n = 14 per group). Pain was evaluated using a 10-cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and edema was assessed using standard linear facial measurements on postoperative days 1, 3, and 7. Changes over time and differences between groups were analyzed using Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE). RESULTS: According to the GEE analysis, both CGF and PRP applications demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in facial edema (tragus-pogonion) compared to the control group; however, the absolute reduction was minimal (0.2-0.5 mm) and likely of limited clinical significance. These applications appear to be effective in edema control following mandibular third molar surgery (CGF: B=-1.056, 95% CI [-1.835, -0.276], p = 0.008; PRP: B=-1.002, 95% CI [-1.750, -0.254], p = 0.009). However, the clinical magnitude of the differences between the groups remained limited. Although pain scores were lower in the CGF group, they did not show a statistically significant difference between the groups. The healing process was completed uneventfully in all groups, and no alveolar osteitis or serious postoperative complications were observed in any patient during the study. CONCLUSIONS: While CGF and PRP applications provided a statistically significant reduction in facial edema following impacted tooth surgery, the minimal magnitude of this reduction suggests it is unlikely to meaningfully improve the patient's postoperative quality of life. Furthermore, their effects on postoperative pain and complications did not offer an additional clinical advantage compared to a standard and atraumatic surgical procedure. Therefore, case-based evaluation is recommended rather than the routine use of these biomaterials. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered retrospectively at ClinicalTrials.gov under the number NCT07320170 on January 06, 2026. Although patient recruitment and data collection began prior to registration due to an initial oversight, the study protocol, including primary and secondary outcome variables and the statistical analysis plan, was established before recruitment commenced, and no changes were made following data collection.

BMC Oral Health
Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University (TR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.