Influence of Body Mass Index on Perioperative Outcomes of Oncologic Head and Neck Free Flaps: Comprehensive Analysis Using a Prospective Institutional Database

Background: The impact of body mass index (BMI) extremes on the outcomes after head and neck cancer (HNC) reconstruction remains uncertain. Herein, we investigate the influence of low and high BMI on the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of oncologic head and neck microvascular reconstruction. Methods: We analyzed a prospective institutional database (09/2019–12/2024). Patients were stratified into underweight, normal weight, overweight, and obesity I, II, and III. Flaps were categorized by donor site (thigh, back, fibula, or forearm). Demographics, intraoperative events, and donor, recipient, and systemic postoperative complications were assessed. Results: Among 542 patients, BMI distribution was: 9.6% underweight (<18.5 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), 34.7% normal weight (≥18.5 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, <25 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), 29.5% overweight (≥25 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, <30kg/m<sup>2</sup>), and 15.5%, 7.0%, and 3.7% within obesity I (≥30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, <35 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), II (≥35 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, <40 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), and III (≥40 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), respectively. Flaps employed significantly differed between low and high BMI groups (<i>P</i><0.001). Underweight patients demonstrated increased odds of donor-site (OR 4.60; <i>P</i>=0.011) and recipient-site (OR 2.49; <i>P</i>=0.007) complications, noteworthily salivary leaks (24.0% vs ≤11.2%; <i>P</i>=0.0322). In subgroup analyses, obesity II patients undergoing thigh-based reconstructions saw increased flap loss (16.7% vs ≤2.4%, <i>P</i>=0.0002); obesity II and III patients trended towards increased recipient-site hematoma (16.7% vs ≤3.6%, <i>P</i>=0.1376) and dehiscence (20.0% vs ≤7.1%, <i>P</i>=0.0824), respectively. <b>Conclusion:</b> BMI extremes relate to perioperative risk in HNC microvascular reconstruction. Underweight status is associated with higher perioperative complications across flaps, while obesity-related risk concentrates in class II/III patients undergoing thigh-based flaps. Findings support BMI-informed preoperative optimization and flap selection strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2903-1493
Primary Topic
Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Influence of Body Mass Index on Perioperative Outcomes of Oncologic Head and Neck Free Flaps: Comprehensive Analysis Using a Prospective Institutional Database

A Duncan, Hong Hao Xu, Mario Solari, Elizabeth D. Dominguez et al.
Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery
Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
article

Influence of Body Mass Index on Perioperative Outcomes of Oncologic Head and Neck Free Flaps: Comprehensive Analysis Using a Prospective Institutional Database

A Duncan, Hong Hao Xu, Mario Solari, Elizabeth D. Dominguez, Vanessa Mroueh, Matthew Bottegal
article en

Abstract

Background: The impact of body mass index (BMI) extremes on the outcomes after head and neck cancer (HNC) reconstruction remains uncertain. Herein, we investigate the influence of low and high BMI on the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of oncologic head and neck microvascular reconstruction. Methods: We analyzed a prospective institutional database (09/2019–12/2024). Patients were stratified into underweight, normal weight, overweight, and obesity I, II, and III. Flaps were categorized by donor site (thigh, back, fibula, or forearm). Demographics, intraoperative events, and donor, recipient, and systemic postoperative complications were assessed. Results: Among 542 patients, BMI distribution was: 9.6% underweight (<18.5 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), 34.7% normal weight (≥18.5 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, <25 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), 29.5% overweight (≥25 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, <30kg/m<sup>2</sup>), and 15.5%, 7.0%, and 3.7% within obesity I (≥30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, <35 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), II (≥35 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, <40 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), and III (≥40 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), respectively. Flaps employed significantly differed between low and high BMI groups (<i>P</i><0.001). Underweight patients demonstrated increased odds of donor-site (OR 4.60; <i>P</i>=0.011) and recipient-site (OR 2.49; <i>P</i>=0.007) complications, noteworthily salivary leaks (24.0% vs ≤11.2%; <i>P</i>=0.0322). In subgroup analyses, obesity II patients undergoing thigh-based reconstructions saw increased flap loss (16.7% vs ≤2.4%, <i>P</i>=0.0002); obesity II and III patients trended towards increased recipient-site hematoma (16.7% vs ≤3.6%, <i>P</i>=0.1376) and dehiscence (20.0% vs ≤7.1%, <i>P</i>=0.0824), respectively. <b>Conclusion:</b> BMI extremes relate to perioperative risk in HNC microvascular reconstruction. Underweight status is associated with higher perioperative complications across flaps, while obesity-related risk concentrates in class II/III patients undergoing thigh-based flaps. Findings support BMI-informed preoperative optimization and flap selection strategies.

Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery
University of Pittsburgh (US), NYU Langone Health (US), UPMC Health System (US), University of Pennsylvania Health System (US), University of Nebraska Medical Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.