Developing initial programme theory for realist economic evaluation: A review of findings from three pilot studies

It is increasingly recognised that ‘big problems’ in health and social care require well-designed solutions and robust evaluation, including attention to costs as well as outcomes. This is especially important in the pervasive environment of resource scarcity. Decisions need to be made that consider not only whether and how an intervention works but also affordability and efficiency in different circumstances and populations. As researchers tackle these complex issues, interest in bringing together realist and economic evaluation is growing. Responding to this, we discuss how using programme theory within a novel realist economic evaluation approach can be used in articulating how interventions may (or may not) bring about cost-effective change. We identify what initial programme theory in realist economic evaluation might look like in practice, drawing on data from three pilot realist economic evaluation studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Evaluation
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13563890261456285
Primary Topic
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Developing initial programme theory for realist economic evaluation: A review of findings from three pilot studies

Andrew Fletcher, Sam Redgate, Sonia Dalkin, Cam Donaldson et al.
Evaluation
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
article

Developing initial programme theory for realist economic evaluation: A review of findings from three pilot studies

Andrew Fletcher, Sam Redgate, Sonia Dalkin, Cam Donaldson, Meghan Bruce Kumar, Rachel Baker, Geoff Wong, Angela Bate, Gill Westhorp, Linda Fenocchi, Rob Anderson, Aikaterini Papadopoulou
article en

Abstract

It is increasingly recognised that ‘big problems’ in health and social care require well-designed solutions and robust evaluation, including attention to costs as well as outcomes. This is especially important in the pervasive environment of resource scarcity. Decisions need to be made that consider not only whether and how an intervention works but also affordability and efficiency in different circumstances and populations. As researchers tackle these complex issues, interest in bringing together realist and economic evaluation is growing. Responding to this, we discuss how using programme theory within a novel realist economic evaluation approach can be used in articulating how interventions may (or may not) bring about cost-effective change. We identify what initial programme theory in realist economic evaluation might look like in practice, drawing on data from three pilot realist economic evaluation studies.

Evaluation
Glasgow Caledonian University (GB), University of Exeter (GB), Charles Darwin University (AU), Northumbria University (GB), University of Oxford (GB)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.