Supporting migration as a response to climate risk: precarity, adaptive capacity, and well-being dimensions

Human migration is a prevalent and widely used strategy to deal with emerging risks from climate and environmental change. Yet the reality of migration and its consequences are underrepresented in policies and interventions for adaptation. We outline a framework that proposes relevant normative dimensions to support evaluation of migration-as-adaptation in terms of what makes it successful, for whom, and in what circumstances. We review evidence from adaptation science, migration, gender and development studies, and urban sustainability that shows how migration-as-adaptation draws on available resources, social networks, and forms of capital to navigate structural inequalities and shifting risks. Interventions to enable migration as an adaptive response, therefore, need to account for the lived experiences and social reproductions of precarity, adaptive capacity, and well-being.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2026.101682
Primary Topic
Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Supporting migration as a response to climate risk: precarity, adaptive capacity, and well-being dimensions

W. Neil Adger, Mark Tebboth, Chandni Singh, Nitya Rao et al.
Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration
article

Supporting migration as a response to climate risk: precarity, adaptive capacity, and well-being dimensions

W. Neil Adger, Mark Tebboth, Chandni Singh, Nitya Rao, Tasneem Siddiqui, Amina Maharjan, Reetika Revathy Subramanian
article en

Abstract

Human migration is a prevalent and widely used strategy to deal with emerging risks from climate and environmental change. Yet the reality of migration and its consequences are underrepresented in policies and interventions for adaptation. We outline a framework that proposes relevant normative dimensions to support evaluation of migration-as-adaptation in terms of what makes it successful, for whom, and in what circumstances. We review evidence from adaptation science, migration, gender and development studies, and urban sustainability that shows how migration-as-adaptation draws on available resources, social networks, and forms of capital to navigate structural inequalities and shifting risks. Interventions to enable migration as an adaptive response, therefore, need to account for the lived experiences and social reproductions of precarity, adaptive capacity, and well-being.

Current Opinion in Environmental SustainabilityVol. 83
International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (NP), University of East Anglia (GB), University of Dhaka (BD), University of Exeter (GB), Indian Institute for Human Settlements (IN), Tyndall Centre (GB)
International Development Research Centre, Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.