Roundtable discussion on rethinking gentrification through urban regeneration

Abstract Urban regeneration has become a central strategy in contemporary urban development, reshaping physical environments while simultaneously transforming social structures, networks, and patterns of access. Across diverse contexts, regeneration initiatives are frequently accompanied by uneven distributions of costs and benefits, often involving residential relocation and long-term changes in neighborhood composition. These dynamics have positioned gentrification as one of the most contested and closely scrutinized issues within debates on urban regeneration. Traditionally, gentrification has been approached predominantly as a negative process associated with displacement, exclusion, and socio-spatial polarization. However, as regeneration practices diversify across institutional, cultural, and governance contexts, this normative framing has increasingly been questioned. Drawing on a transnational roundtable discussion convened under the Humboldt Cities Network, this article brings together perspectives from Europe and China to re-examine gentrification as a context-dependent, multi-dimensional process rather than a uniform outcome of urban change. The roundtable contributions highlight both shared analytical foundations and substantial variation in how these mechanisms unfold across different land regimes, state capacities, and development trajectories. This article argues for a more differentiated and comparative understanding of gentrification, emphasizing its analytical value in identifying long-term transformations of urban social structure rather than serving as a universal normative label.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers of Urban and Rural Planning
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44243-026-00085-6
Primary Topic
Urban Planning and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Roundtable discussion on rethinking gentrification through urban regeneration

Jing Gan, Jie Yin, Matthias Bernt, Jingwei Wu et al.
Frontiers of Urban and Rural Planning
Urban Planning and Governance
article

Roundtable discussion on rethinking gentrification through urban regeneration

Jing Gan, Jie Yin, Matthias Bernt, Jingwei Wu, Chengzhi Yin, Pietro Elisei, Klaus Kunzmann, H Huang, Xin Yi, Xiaoyun Jiang, Ruhang Wei, Andrea Krupski von Mansberg, Juan Yan, Jörn Walter, Elisabeth Gruber, Li Fan
article en

Abstract

Abstract Urban regeneration has become a central strategy in contemporary urban development, reshaping physical environments while simultaneously transforming social structures, networks, and patterns of access. Across diverse contexts, regeneration initiatives are frequently accompanied by uneven distributions of costs and benefits, often involving residential relocation and long-term changes in neighborhood composition. These dynamics have positioned gentrification as one of the most contested and closely scrutinized issues within debates on urban regeneration. Traditionally, gentrification has been approached predominantly as a negative process associated with displacement, exclusion, and socio-spatial polarization. However, as regeneration practices diversify across institutional, cultural, and governance contexts, this normative framing has increasingly been questioned. Drawing on a transnational roundtable discussion convened under the Humboldt Cities Network, this article brings together perspectives from Europe and China to re-examine gentrification as a context-dependent, multi-dimensional process rather than a uniform outcome of urban change. The roundtable contributions highlight both shared analytical foundations and substantial variation in how these mechanisms unfold across different land regimes, state capacities, and development trajectories. This article argues for a more differentiated and comparative understanding of gentrification, emphasizing its analytical value in identifying long-term transformations of urban social structure rather than serving as a universal normative label.

Frontiers of Urban and Rural PlanningVol. 4(1)
Tongji University (CN), Universität Innsbruck (AT), TU Dortmund University (DE), HafenCity University Hamburg (DE), United Nations Human Settlements Programme (KE), Leibniz Institute for Research on Society and Space (DE), Shanghai Tongji Urban Planning and Design Institute (CN), Changsha University of Science and Technology (CN), Southeast University (CN), KPMG (United Kingdom) (GB), Tsinghua University (CN)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Urban Planning and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.