Mobilising nature-based solutions (NbS) for coastal protection: Public preferences for hard, soft and hybrid coastal protection measures in Bali, Indonesia

Mobilising nature-based solutions (NbS) is increasingly considered as a sustainable and climate-resilient alternative to conventional approaches to coastal protection. This often involves trade-offs between protection effectiveness/timing, ecological outcomes, and infrastructure design that vary between contexts. However, public preferences regarding these trade-offs remain insufficiently understood, particularly in rapidly developing coastal regions in the Global South. This study aims to investigate public preferences of coastal protection measures focusing on Bali (Indonesia), a rapidly transforming and tourism-dependent coastal region facing increasing climate and development pressures. We employ a discrete choice experiment (DCE) (n = 370) analysed using a Mixed Logit model and Latent Class Analysis (LCA) to evaluate how trade-offs in key attributes of coastal protection measures (“Protection level”, “Urgency of protection”, “Lifetime”, “Biodiversity” and “Materials) influence public choices across very different coastal protection paradigms (hard, soft, and hybrid measures), and the related heterogeneity. The results reveal strong preference for coastal protection options characterised by full protection, faster implementation, longer durability, natural materials, and positive impacts on biodiversity. Among the alternatives, hybrid measures were the most preferred, followed by hard and soft measures. However, there is significant heterogeneity in preferences across socio-demographic characteristics. By explicitly examining trade-offs between the preferences for hard, hybrid, and soft coastal protection measures, we provide new empirical evidence on public support for multifunctional coastal protection approaches. This evidence fills to the growing literature on NbS by demonstrating how public preferences can inform the design of climate-resilient coastal protection strategies in tourism-dependent coastal regions and other rapidly developing coastal areas.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Landscape and Urban Planning
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2026.105732
Primary Topic
Coastal and Marine Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mobilising nature-based solutions (NbS) for coastal protection: Public preferences for hard, soft and hybrid coastal protection measures in Bali, Indonesia

Lam Thi Mai Huynh, Alexandros Gasparatos, Takeshi Takama, Rodolfo Dam Lam
Landscape and Urban Planning
Coastal and Marine Management
article

Mobilising nature-based solutions (NbS) for coastal protection: Public preferences for hard, soft and hybrid coastal protection measures in Bali, Indonesia

Lam Thi Mai Huynh, Alexandros Gasparatos, Takeshi Takama, Rodolfo Dam Lam
article en

Abstract

Mobilising nature-based solutions (NbS) is increasingly considered as a sustainable and climate-resilient alternative to conventional approaches to coastal protection. This often involves trade-offs between protection effectiveness/timing, ecological outcomes, and infrastructure design that vary between contexts. However, public preferences regarding these trade-offs remain insufficiently understood, particularly in rapidly developing coastal regions in the Global South. This study aims to investigate public preferences of coastal protection measures focusing on Bali (Indonesia), a rapidly transforming and tourism-dependent coastal region facing increasing climate and development pressures. We employ a discrete choice experiment (DCE) (n = 370) analysed using a Mixed Logit model and Latent Class Analysis (LCA) to evaluate how trade-offs in key attributes of coastal protection measures (“Protection level”, “Urgency of protection”, “Lifetime”, “Biodiversity” and “Materials) influence public choices across very different coastal protection paradigms (hard, soft, and hybrid measures), and the related heterogeneity. The results reveal strong preference for coastal protection options characterised by full protection, faster implementation, longer durability, natural materials, and positive impacts on biodiversity. Among the alternatives, hybrid measures were the most preferred, followed by hard and soft measures. However, there is significant heterogeneity in preferences across socio-demographic characteristics. By explicitly examining trade-offs between the preferences for hard, hybrid, and soft coastal protection measures, we provide new empirical evidence on public support for multifunctional coastal protection approaches. This evidence fills to the growing literature on NbS by demonstrating how public preferences can inform the design of climate-resilient coastal protection strategies in tourism-dependent coastal regions and other rapidly developing coastal areas.

Landscape and Urban PlanningVol. 275
University of Tsukuba (JP), United Nations University Institute for Sustainability and Peace (JP), Institute for Future Engineering (JP), United Nations University Institute for the Advanced Study of Sustainability (JP), Ana G. Mendez University System (PR), WorldFish (MY)
Sumitomo Foundation, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Coastal and Marine Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.