Not Under Our Watch: The Effect of Global‐Local Identity on Boycott Participation

ABSTRACT With boycotts becoming a ubiquitous global phenomenon, the paper examines the effects of global versus local identity on individuals' decisions to participate in boycotts. Across multiple studies, including real‐world multicountry secondary data and controlled experiments, the paper demonstrates that individuals with salient global (vs. local) identities exhibit a positive attitude towards boycotts and a greater tendency to participate in boycotts. In addition, the paper demonstrates the key effect across different boycott contexts. Furthermore, a stronger belief in collective action efficacy among individuals with salient global identities explains why such individuals exhibit a greater tendency to participate in boycotts. Later studies in this paper explore contextual factors that moderate this relationship and offer managerial, and policy implications aimed at corporate remedial response. Our findings offer valuable insights with significant implications for both theory and practice, particularly in the realms of marketing strategies and public policy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychology and Marketing
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.70200
Primary Topic
Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Not Under Our Watch: The Effect of Global‐Local Identity on Boycott Participation

Ritesh Saini, P. Banerjee, Shashi Minchael
Psychology and Marketing
Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
article

Not Under Our Watch: The Effect of Global‐Local Identity on Boycott Participation

Ritesh Saini, P. Banerjee, Shashi Minchael
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT With boycotts becoming a ubiquitous global phenomenon, the paper examines the effects of global versus local identity on individuals' decisions to participate in boycotts. Across multiple studies, including real‐world multicountry secondary data and controlled experiments, the paper demonstrates that individuals with salient global (vs. local) identities exhibit a positive attitude towards boycotts and a greater tendency to participate in boycotts. In addition, the paper demonstrates the key effect across different boycott contexts. Furthermore, a stronger belief in collective action efficacy among individuals with salient global identities explains why such individuals exhibit a greater tendency to participate in boycotts. Later studies in this paper explore contextual factors that moderate this relationship and offer managerial, and policy implications aimed at corporate remedial response. Our findings offer valuable insights with significant implications for both theory and practice, particularly in the realms of marketing strategies and public policy.

Psychology and Marketing
Texas Woman's University (US), The University of Texas at Arlington (US), Missouri Western State University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.