Limits of an episteme: Conceptualizing epistemic voids within agricultural knowledge systems and future-making in rural Africa

This paper develops the concept of epistemic voids to theorize how structural absences within knowledge systems shape agricultural transformation and future-making in marginalized rural regions. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork with smallholder horticultural farmers in Namibia’s Zambezi Region, it examines how these voids emerge through material constraints, fragmented institutions, and uneven access to knowledge. Epistemic voids become visible in fractured seed systems, limited horticultural expertise, and the marginalization of farmers’ practical and experience-based knowledge, while simultaneously generating new forms of learning, experimentation, and adaptation – which in turn constrain and generate rural, agrarian futures distinctively. By integrating Foucault’s notion of the episteme, Scott’s theories of mētis and legibility, and insights from futures studies, the paper theorizes epistemic voids as relational, generative, and temporal conditions that mediate between knowledge, power, and future-making. Within these conditions, farmers mobilize local expertise, cross-border knowledge networks, and collective experimentation to pursue resilient, though often partial, agrarian futures. While grounded in agrarian transformation, the application extends beyond agriculture: epistemic voids characterize broader domains of socioecological and systematic transformation such as climate governance and technological transitions, where prevailing epistemes along with their material, institutional, and knowledge components encounter their limits. Recognizing the productive, political, and unending natures of absence, the paper advances epistemic voids towards more nuanced scholarly and policy understandings of how diverse epistemic resources and practices interact generatively. By moving beyond attempts to fill perceived ‘gaps’, epistemic voids open pathways toward more adaptive, just, and plural futures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geoforum
Published
2026-06-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2026.104742
Primary Topic
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Limits of an episteme: Conceptualizing epistemic voids within agricultural knowledge systems and future-making in rural Africa

Anna‐Katharina Hornidge, Saymore Ngonidzashe Kativu
Geoforum
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
article

Limits of an episteme: Conceptualizing epistemic voids within agricultural knowledge systems and future-making in rural Africa

Anna‐Katharina Hornidge, Saymore Ngonidzashe Kativu
article en

Abstract

This paper develops the concept of epistemic voids to theorize how structural absences within knowledge systems shape agricultural transformation and future-making in marginalized rural regions. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork with smallholder horticultural farmers in Namibia’s Zambezi Region, it examines how these voids emerge through material constraints, fragmented institutions, and uneven access to knowledge. Epistemic voids become visible in fractured seed systems, limited horticultural expertise, and the marginalization of farmers’ practical and experience-based knowledge, while simultaneously generating new forms of learning, experimentation, and adaptation – which in turn constrain and generate rural, agrarian futures distinctively. By integrating Foucault’s notion of the episteme, Scott’s theories of mētis and legibility, and insights from futures studies, the paper theorizes epistemic voids as relational, generative, and temporal conditions that mediate between knowledge, power, and future-making. Within these conditions, farmers mobilize local expertise, cross-border knowledge networks, and collective experimentation to pursue resilient, though often partial, agrarian futures. While grounded in agrarian transformation, the application extends beyond agriculture: epistemic voids characterize broader domains of socioecological and systematic transformation such as climate governance and technological transitions, where prevailing epistemes along with their material, institutional, and knowledge components encounter their limits. Recognizing the productive, political, and unending natures of absence, the paper advances epistemic voids towards more nuanced scholarly and policy understandings of how diverse epistemic resources and practices interact generatively. By moving beyond attempts to fill perceived ‘gaps’, epistemic voids open pathways toward more adaptive, just, and plural futures.

GeoforumVol. 175
University of Bonn (DE), German Institute of Development and Sustainability (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.