DTA Distributed Task Scheduler Formal Mathematical Analysis: Correctness, Progress, Performance, and Competitive Bounds

This paper presents a unified formal mathematical analysis of the DTA distributed task scheduler. Using a second-quantisation-inspired operator formalism, we establish: (I) correctness properties --- no task loss, deadlock freedom, livelock freedom, and linearizability; (II) progress properties --- bounded waiting time and starvation freedom; (III) quantitative performance bounds --- load balance, kinetic-theory corrections to mean-field, makespan bounds via extreme-value theory, and a four-level stability ladder; and (IV) competitive and empirical analysis --- online competitive ratio relative to work stealing, adversarial stability comparison, and correspondence with Criterion benchmark measurements on GitHub Actions CI. All theoretical predictions are numerically validated and, where applicable, matched against empirical wall-clock data.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-06-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20998768
Primary Topic
Real-Time Systems Scheduling
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

DTA Distributed Task Scheduler Formal Mathematical Analysis: Correctness, Progress, Performance, and Competitive Bounds

Xinyu Yang
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Real-Time Systems Scheduling
preprint

DTA Distributed Task Scheduler Formal Mathematical Analysis: Correctness, Progress, Performance, and Competitive Bounds

Xinyu Yang
preprint en

Abstract

This paper presents a unified formal mathematical analysis of the DTA distributed task scheduler. Using a second-quantisation-inspired operator formalism, we establish: (I) correctness properties --- no task loss, deadlock freedom, livelock freedom, and linearizability; (II) progress properties --- bounded waiting time and starvation freedom; (III) quantitative performance bounds --- load balance, kinetic-theory corrections to mean-field, makespan bounds via extreme-value theory, and a four-level stability ladder; and (IV) competitive and empirical analysis --- online competitive ratio relative to work stealing, adversarial stability comparison, and correspondence with Criterion benchmark measurements on GitHub Actions CI. All theoretical predictions are numerically validated and, where applicable, matched against empirical wall-clock data.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Real-Time Systems Scheduling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.