The Cardinality of Experience Is Underdetermined by the Quantum State: A Constructive Case for a Consciousness-Primitive Interpretation

Quantum mechanics and the metaphysics of consciousness are usually pursued apart; this paper joins them with a result and an interpretation. The result: the number of unified subjects of experience — the cardinality of experience — is not fixed by anything operationally accessible to a localized perspective in a no-collapse setting; we exhibit this computationally and state it precisely. The significance of the result lies less in the underdetermination itself than in what follows from it: the decombination problem (the standard objection to cosmopsychism) and Everett's how-many-minds problem are the same underdetermination seen from opposite sides, meaning the dialectical cost is shared, not a special liability of consciousness-first views. The non-determination isolates the minimal posit every no-collapse interpretation must add. Taking that posit as ground yields a structural cosmopsychism on which a universal subject's self-relational structure is the Hilbert-space structure. Advaita Vedānta supplies illuminating labels for moves the view defines independently.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-06-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21007976
Primary Topic
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

The Cardinality of Experience Is Underdetermined by the Quantum State: A Constructive Case for a Consciousness-Primitive Interpretation

Rohit Chauhan
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
preprint

The Cardinality of Experience Is Underdetermined by the Quantum State: A Constructive Case for a Consciousness-Primitive Interpretation

Rohit Chauhan
preprint en

Abstract

Quantum mechanics and the metaphysics of consciousness are usually pursued apart; this paper joins them with a result and an interpretation. The result: the number of unified subjects of experience — the cardinality of experience — is not fixed by anything operationally accessible to a localized perspective in a no-collapse setting; we exhibit this computationally and state it precisely. The significance of the result lies less in the underdetermination itself than in what follows from it: the decombination problem (the standard objection to cosmopsychism) and Everett's how-many-minds problem are the same underdetermination seen from opposite sides, meaning the dialectical cost is shared, not a special liability of consciousness-first views. The non-determination isolates the minimal posit every no-collapse interpretation must add. Taking that posit as ground yields a structural cosmopsychism on which a universal subject's self-relational structure is the Hilbert-space structure. Advaita Vedānta supplies illuminating labels for moves the view defines independently.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Reduced inequalities
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.