What evidence exists for the environmental outcomes of nature-based aquaculture systems? a systematic map protocol

BACKGROUND: Nature-based solutions (NbS) are defined as actions that protect, conserve, restore, and sustainably use natural or modified ecosystems. These actions aim to deliver environmental services, enhance biodiversity, and support societal well-being. NbS are increasingly promoted across a wide range of sectors, including agriculture, coastal management, and civil engineering. However, despite being introduced almost twenty years ago, NBS appear not to have been widely and explicitly adopted in aquaculture production systems policies and practices, arguably because there is little evidence of their efficacy in improving environmental outcomes and production. This systematic map therefore seeks to address the primary review question: What evidence exists in the literature on reported environmental outcomes associated with nature-based approaches in aquaculture? To answer this question, the study will identify, collate, and characterize the available evidence on nature-based approaches applied within aquaculture systems. METHODS: This systematic map will follow a structured evidence-synthesis approach to identify and characterize literature on nature-based solutions in aquaculture. Comprehensive searches will be conducted across established scientific databases using carefully developed search strings, and these will be complemented by targeted grey literature searches across specialist aquaculture and NbS platforms, as well as Google Scholar. Retrieved records will be screened at title, abstract, and full-text levels against predefined eligibility criteria. Studies will be included if they focus on aquaculture systems, examine interventions framed as or consistent with NbS, report outcomes related to environmental performance, socio-economic value, or policy relevance, and are based on empirical evidence from peer-reviewed or credible grey literature sources. Data from eligible studies will be extracted and summarized descriptively, followed by a narrative synthesis to identify thematic clusters, geographical patterns, and gaps in the evidence base. The outputs will provide a structured knowledge base to inform researchers, practitioners, and policymakers seeking to expand the application of NbS in aquaculture.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Evidence
Published
2026-06-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-026-00387-8
Primary Topic
Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What evidence exists for the environmental outcomes of nature-based aquaculture systems? a systematic map protocol

Edward H. Allison, Wen Jye Mok, Mazlan Abd. Ghaffar, Mohd Iqbal Mohd Noor et al.
Environmental Evidence
Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies
article

What evidence exists for the environmental outcomes of nature-based aquaculture systems? a systematic map protocol

Edward H. Allison, Wen Jye Mok, Mazlan Abd. Ghaffar, Mohd Iqbal Mohd Noor, Tengku Sifzizul Tengku Muhammad, Aileen Tan Shau Hwai, Min Pau Tan, Yeong Yik Sung, Nor Afiqah‐Aleng, Mohamad Nor Azra, Thirukanthan Chandra Segaran, Teoh Shwu Jiau, Muhd Danish Daniel Abdullah, Li Lian Wong
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nature-based solutions (NbS) are defined as actions that protect, conserve, restore, and sustainably use natural or modified ecosystems. These actions aim to deliver environmental services, enhance biodiversity, and support societal well-being. NbS are increasingly promoted across a wide range of sectors, including agriculture, coastal management, and civil engineering. However, despite being introduced almost twenty years ago, NBS appear not to have been widely and explicitly adopted in aquaculture production systems policies and practices, arguably because there is little evidence of their efficacy in improving environmental outcomes and production. This systematic map therefore seeks to address the primary review question: What evidence exists in the literature on reported environmental outcomes associated with nature-based approaches in aquaculture? To answer this question, the study will identify, collate, and characterize the available evidence on nature-based approaches applied within aquaculture systems. METHODS: This systematic map will follow a structured evidence-synthesis approach to identify and characterize literature on nature-based solutions in aquaculture. Comprehensive searches will be conducted across established scientific databases using carefully developed search strings, and these will be complemented by targeted grey literature searches across specialist aquaculture and NbS platforms, as well as Google Scholar. Retrieved records will be screened at title, abstract, and full-text levels against predefined eligibility criteria. Studies will be included if they focus on aquaculture systems, examine interventions framed as or consistent with NbS, report outcomes related to environmental performance, socio-economic value, or policy relevance, and are based on empirical evidence from peer-reviewed or credible grey literature sources. Data from eligible studies will be extracted and summarized descriptively, followed by a narrative synthesis to identify thematic clusters, geographical patterns, and gaps in the evidence base. The outputs will provide a structured knowledge base to inform researchers, practitioners, and policymakers seeking to expand the application of NbS in aquaculture.

Environmental Evidence
Universiti Sains Malaysia (MY), Universiti Malaysia Terengganu (MY), WorldFish (MY), Universiti Teknologi MARA (MY)
International Development Research Centre
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.