Evaluation of the Efficacy of Artificial Intelligence–Based Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy in a Predominantly Non-White Population

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of Luminetics Core, a Food and Drug Administration–cleared artificial intelligence–based screening system, in the detection of diabetic retinopathy (DR) in a predominately non-White population and identify potential shortcomings in clinical implementation that should be addressed to mitigate disparities in health care. METHODS: Data were acquired via retrospective chart review and included 225 patients with a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus who were screened for DR using the LumineticsCore system (formerly IDx-DR) at the University Medical Center New Orleans (Louisiana). Metrics to assess DR detection efficacy included sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, likelihood ratios, and indeterminate screening result rates. Stratified analyses regarding associated medical comorbidities also were performed. Clinic follow-up rates and time frames also were noted per screen result group. RESULTS: The study population had a diverse demographic profile, with 69.0% of subjects identifying as African American, 13.1% Hispanic, 10.7% White, 3.6% Asian, and 3.6% of subjects who either did not identify with the above racial/ethnic groups or declined to self-identify. The system yielded favorable performance measures in the study population regarding detection accuracy. It was found, however, that although most patients with a positive screen had ophthalmology referrals placed, 29.8% of patients with positive screen results did not attend their scheduled ophthalmology visit. CONCLUSIONS: The LumineticsCore system was found to be a reliable screening test for the detection of DR in the study population. The relatively high no-show rate for scheduled ophthalmology referrals in patients with positive screen results, however, sheds light on an implementation system issue in need of further evaluation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed Central
Published
2026-07-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14423/smj.0000000000001990
Primary Topic
Retinal Imaging and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of the Efficacy of Artificial Intelligence–Based Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy in a Predominantly Non-White Population

Michael Wang, Sydney Marie Galindez, Matt Holleman, David Miguel Hinkle et al.
PubMed Central
Retinal Imaging and Analysis
article

Evaluation of the Efficacy of Artificial Intelligence–Based Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy in a Predominantly Non-White Population

Michael Wang, Sydney Marie Galindez, Matt Holleman, David Miguel Hinkle, Queenie Wang
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of Luminetics Core, a Food and Drug Administration–cleared artificial intelligence–based screening system, in the detection of diabetic retinopathy (DR) in a predominately non-White population and identify potential shortcomings in clinical implementation that should be addressed to mitigate disparities in health care. METHODS: Data were acquired via retrospective chart review and included 225 patients with a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus who were screened for DR using the LumineticsCore system (formerly IDx-DR) at the University Medical Center New Orleans (Louisiana). Metrics to assess DR detection efficacy included sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, likelihood ratios, and indeterminate screening result rates. Stratified analyses regarding associated medical comorbidities also were performed. Clinic follow-up rates and time frames also were noted per screen result group. RESULTS: The study population had a diverse demographic profile, with 69.0% of subjects identifying as African American, 13.1% Hispanic, 10.7% White, 3.6% Asian, and 3.6% of subjects who either did not identify with the above racial/ethnic groups or declined to self-identify. The system yielded favorable performance measures in the study population regarding detection accuracy. It was found, however, that although most patients with a positive screen had ophthalmology referrals placed, 29.8% of patients with positive screen results did not attend their scheduled ophthalmology visit. CONCLUSIONS: The LumineticsCore system was found to be a reliable screening test for the detection of DR in the study population. The relatively high no-show rate for scheduled ophthalmology referrals in patients with positive screen results, however, sheds light on an implementation system issue in need of further evaluation.

PubMed Central
Tulane University (US), University of California, Irvine (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Retinal Imaging and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.