Jumping to Conclusions in First‐Episode Psychosis and Bipolar Disorder

AIM: Jumping to conclusions (JTC) bias, which is frequently observed in psychosis, is the tendency to make decisions based on inadequate information. This study explored JTC bias in individuals with first-episode bipolar disorder (FEBD, n = 52), first-episode psychosis (FEP, n = 61) and healthy controls (HCs, n = 38). METHOD: JTC bias was assessed using the Bead Task, in which participants were asked to draw as many beads as they wanted and make conclusions about their source. RESULT: The results showed that both the FEBD and FEP groups exhibited a significantly longer response time and higher tendency to make decisions after drawing a single bead compared to HCs, indicating a subtle tendency towards hastier decision-making in these patient groups. No significant correlations were found between JTC bias and clinical measures. DISCUSSION: This study highlights that JTC bias is present in both FEP and FEBD, pointing to potential vulnerabilities in decision-making early in these disorders. These findings highlight the need for further research to determine whether addressing reasoning biases could ultimately benefit decision-making processes in these populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Early Intervention in Psychiatry
Published
2026-06-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/eip.70212
Primary Topic
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Jumping to Conclusions in First‐Episode Psychosis and Bipolar Disorder

Ezgi Cesim, Burcu Verim, Muhammed Demir, Cemal Demirlek et al.
Early Intervention in Psychiatry
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
article

Jumping to Conclusions in First‐Episode Psychosis and Bipolar Disorder

Ezgi Cesim, Burcu Verim, Muhammed Demir, Cemal Demirlek, Ekin Süt, Aybüke KÜÇÜKAKDAĞ, Yaren Ecesu Turan, Merve S Eyuboglu, Özge İlhan, Emre Bora, Simge Uzman Özbek, Berna Yalınçetin
article en

Abstract

AIM: Jumping to conclusions (JTC) bias, which is frequently observed in psychosis, is the tendency to make decisions based on inadequate information. This study explored JTC bias in individuals with first-episode bipolar disorder (FEBD, n = 52), first-episode psychosis (FEP, n = 61) and healthy controls (HCs, n = 38). METHOD: JTC bias was assessed using the Bead Task, in which participants were asked to draw as many beads as they wanted and make conclusions about their source. RESULT: The results showed that both the FEBD and FEP groups exhibited a significantly longer response time and higher tendency to make decisions after drawing a single bead compared to HCs, indicating a subtle tendency towards hastier decision-making in these patient groups. No significant correlations were found between JTC bias and clinical measures. DISCUSSION: This study highlights that JTC bias is present in both FEP and FEBD, pointing to potential vulnerabilities in decision-making early in these disorders. These findings highlight the need for further research to determine whether addressing reasoning biases could ultimately benefit decision-making processes in these populations.

Early Intervention in PsychiatryVol. 20(7)
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US), Harvard University (US), Dokuz Eylül University (TR), Melbourne Health (AU)
Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.