Explainable Machine Learning‐Assisted Progressive Collapse Resistance Prediction of Reinforced Concrete Beam‐Column Substructures

ABSTRACT Reinforced concrete (RC) beam‐column substructures are the key supports of frame structures, which experiences compressive arch action (CAA) and tensile catenary action (TCA) to resist the progressive collapse. Existing expression models involve complicated inference processes, which struggle with generalized application due to specific simplified assumptions. This paper proposes a new progressive collapse resistance prediction model of RC substructures driven by interpretable hybrid machine learning methods. A high‐quality database integrated with 10‐dimensional features is established, including CAA and TCA stages during progressive collapse. Three different machine learning models are proposed to conduct a comparison including random forest (RF), least square boosting (LSBoost), and generalized additive models (GAM). Particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm is adopted herein to obtain the optimal machine learning model parameters. The Shapley (SHAP) analysis is performed to reveal the prediction process of machine learners involving global interpretable, local interpretable and feature dependence. The results show that PSO‐RF model has a better peak prediction accuracy than PSO‐LSBoost and PSO‐GAM models during CAA and TCA stages. Based on SHAP learning, it is known that the span‐to‐height ratio and cross‐sectional area have significant impacts on the model's prediction results. The proposed PSO‐RF model has superior computational accuracy than existing physical models, which provides a key support for the codes revision of RC structures to resist progressive collapse.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Earthquake Engineering and Resilience
Published
2026-06-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/eer2.70044
Primary Topic
Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Explainable Machine Learning‐Assisted Progressive Collapse Resistance Prediction of Reinforced Concrete Beam‐Column Substructures

Yu He, Nian Lin, Kai Qian, Xiaohui Yu
Earthquake Engineering and Resilience
Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
article

Explainable Machine Learning‐Assisted Progressive Collapse Resistance Prediction of Reinforced Concrete Beam‐Column Substructures

Yu He, Nian Lin, Kai Qian, Xiaohui Yu
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Reinforced concrete (RC) beam‐column substructures are the key supports of frame structures, which experiences compressive arch action (CAA) and tensile catenary action (TCA) to resist the progressive collapse. Existing expression models involve complicated inference processes, which struggle with generalized application due to specific simplified assumptions. This paper proposes a new progressive collapse resistance prediction model of RC substructures driven by interpretable hybrid machine learning methods. A high‐quality database integrated with 10‐dimensional features is established, including CAA and TCA stages during progressive collapse. Three different machine learning models are proposed to conduct a comparison including random forest (RF), least square boosting (LSBoost), and generalized additive models (GAM). Particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm is adopted herein to obtain the optimal machine learning model parameters. The Shapley (SHAP) analysis is performed to reveal the prediction process of machine learners involving global interpretable, local interpretable and feature dependence. The results show that PSO‐RF model has a better peak prediction accuracy than PSO‐LSBoost and PSO‐GAM models during CAA and TCA stages. Based on SHAP learning, it is known that the span‐to‐height ratio and cross‐sectional area have significant impacts on the model's prediction results. The proposed PSO‐RF model has superior computational accuracy than existing physical models, which provides a key support for the codes revision of RC structures to resist progressive collapse.

Earthquake Engineering and Resilience
Guilin University of Technology (CN), Guilin University of Electronic Technology (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.