Environmental Footprint Reduction Through Hybrid Meat Products: A Consequential <scp>LCA</scp> of Chicken–Vegetable Substitution

ABSTRACT The environmental footprint associated with conventional meat production necessitates the development of strategies that reduce environmental impacts while maintaining consumer acceptance. Hybrid meat products, which partially replace animal‐derived ingredients with plant‐based components, represent a pragmatic transitional approach toward more sustainable diets. In the present study, 100% chicken breast and hybrid products containing 75%, 50%, and 25% chicken were compared. The study showed that ingredient composition is the primary driver of environmental performance in chicken‐based and hybrid meat formulations. Across all midpoint impact categories, burdens increased in an approximately linear manner with rising chicken content, indicating that impacts are governed by the animal‐derived fraction rather than non‐linear process effects or efficiency gains. Because all scenarios were harmonized to identical mass and energy equivalence, differences can be attributed directly to formulation. Climate change impact increased from 58.80 kg CO 2 ‐eq in the 25% chicken to 230.65 kg CO 2 ‐eq for 100% chicken. Similar scaling was observed across all assessed categories. High substitution levels yielded substantial mitigation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Food Process Engineering
Published
2026-06-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpe.70667
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Environmental Footprint Reduction Through Hybrid Meat Products: A Consequential LCA of Chicken–Vegetable Substitution

Simona Grasso, Emel Hasan Yusuf
Journal of Food Process Engineering
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
article

Environmental Footprint Reduction Through Hybrid Meat Products: A Consequential LCA of Chicken–Vegetable Substitution

Simona Grasso, Emel Hasan Yusuf
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The environmental footprint associated with conventional meat production necessitates the development of strategies that reduce environmental impacts while maintaining consumer acceptance. Hybrid meat products, which partially replace animal‐derived ingredients with plant‐based components, represent a pragmatic transitional approach toward more sustainable diets. In the present study, 100% chicken breast and hybrid products containing 75%, 50%, and 25% chicken were compared. The study showed that ingredient composition is the primary driver of environmental performance in chicken‐based and hybrid meat formulations. Across all midpoint impact categories, burdens increased in an approximately linear manner with rising chicken content, indicating that impacts are governed by the animal‐derived fraction rather than non‐linear process effects or efficiency gains. Because all scenarios were harmonized to identical mass and energy equivalence, differences can be attributed directly to formulation. Climate change impact increased from 58.80 kg CO 2 ‐eq in the 25% chicken to 230.65 kg CO 2 ‐eq for 100% chicken. Similar scaling was observed across all assessed categories. High substitution levels yielded substantial mitigation.

Journal of Food Process EngineeringVol. 49(7)
University College Dublin (IE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.