Preoperative 5-Factor Frailty Index and Clavien–Dindo Grade ≥ II Complications Following Open Radical Nephrectomy: A Prospective Single-Center Cohort Study

Background/Objective: Preoperative frailty assessment before open radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is underused, and prospective data on the 5-Factor Frailty Index (5-IFi) are limited. We examined the association between the preoperative 5-IFi score and postoperative complications at a private tertiary center in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Methods: In this prospective cohort study, 30 adults with suspected or confirmed RCC scheduled for elective open radical nephrectomy were enrolled after ethics approval. The 5-IFi was scored preoperatively from records and medication lists. The primary outcome was any Clavien–Dindo grade ≥ II complication during the index hospitalization; secondary outcomes were length of stay and 30-day unplanned readmission. Groups were compared using Mann–Whitney U and Fisher’s exact tests. Associations were estimated by Firth penalized logistic regression with profile-likelihood confidence intervals (CIs) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis with bootstrapped CIs; adjusted models were exploratory given the sample size. Results: Fourteen patients (46.7%) developed a grade ≥ II complication, all grade II; nine (30.0%) were frail (5-IFi ≥ 2). The 5-IFi score was the only baseline variable significantly associated with the outcome (median 1.5 vs. 1.0; p = 0.030). Each 1-point increase was associated with higher odds (unadjusted OR 2.35, 95% CI 1.16–6.80; adjusted for age and creatinine, OR 2.10, 95% CI 1.00–5.91). Discrimination was moderate but imprecise (AUC 0.72, 95% CI 0.53–0.88). At the ≥2 threshold, frail patients had a higher complication rate than non-frail/pre-frail patients (77.8% vs. 33.3%; Fisher’s exact p = 0.046; exact OR 6.5, 95% CI 0.92–80.65), with sensitivity 50.0% and specificity 87.5%; length of stay was marginally longer in frail patients (p = 0.035). No grade ≥ III complications or deaths occurred. Conclusions: In this small single-center cohort, a higher 5-IFi score was associated with grade ≥ II complications, consistent after limited adjustment. Given the small sample, imprecise estimates, and exclusively grade II events, these findings are preliminary and hypothesis-generating. Multicenter validation is required before the 5-IFi can guide preoperative risk stratification or prehabilitation triage.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare
Published
2026-06-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14131886
Primary Topic
Frailty in Older Adults
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preoperative 5-Factor Frailty Index and Clavien–Dindo Grade ≥ II Complications Following Open Radical Nephrectomy: A Prospective Single-Center Cohort Study

Sadia Qazi, Mohammad Shoaib, Kanza Atif, Azura Rozila Ahmad et al.
Healthcare
Frailty in Older Adults
article

Preoperative 5-Factor Frailty Index and Clavien–Dindo Grade ≥ II Complications Following Open Radical Nephrectomy: A Prospective Single-Center Cohort Study

Sadia Qazi, Mohammad Shoaib, Kanza Atif, Azura Rozila Ahmad, Eshal Atif, Aminah Saqib, Hukam Rawan Khan
article en

Abstract

Background/Objective: Preoperative frailty assessment before open radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is underused, and prospective data on the 5-Factor Frailty Index (5-IFi) are limited. We examined the association between the preoperative 5-IFi score and postoperative complications at a private tertiary center in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Methods: In this prospective cohort study, 30 adults with suspected or confirmed RCC scheduled for elective open radical nephrectomy were enrolled after ethics approval. The 5-IFi was scored preoperatively from records and medication lists. The primary outcome was any Clavien–Dindo grade ≥ II complication during the index hospitalization; secondary outcomes were length of stay and 30-day unplanned readmission. Groups were compared using Mann–Whitney U and Fisher’s exact tests. Associations were estimated by Firth penalized logistic regression with profile-likelihood confidence intervals (CIs) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis with bootstrapped CIs; adjusted models were exploratory given the sample size. Results: Fourteen patients (46.7%) developed a grade ≥ II complication, all grade II; nine (30.0%) were frail (5-IFi ≥ 2). The 5-IFi score was the only baseline variable significantly associated with the outcome (median 1.5 vs. 1.0; p = 0.030). Each 1-point increase was associated with higher odds (unadjusted OR 2.35, 95% CI 1.16–6.80; adjusted for age and creatinine, OR 2.10, 95% CI 1.00–5.91). Discrimination was moderate but imprecise (AUC 0.72, 95% CI 0.53–0.88). At the ≥2 threshold, frail patients had a higher complication rate than non-frail/pre-frail patients (77.8% vs. 33.3%; Fisher’s exact p = 0.046; exact OR 6.5, 95% CI 0.92–80.65), with sensitivity 50.0% and specificity 87.5%; length of stay was marginally longer in frail patients (p = 0.035). No grade ≥ III complications or deaths occurred. Conclusions: In this small single-center cohort, a higher 5-IFi score was associated with grade ≥ II complications, consistent after limited adjustment. Given the small sample, imprecise estimates, and exclusively grade II events, these findings are preliminary and hypothesis-generating. Multicenter validation is required before the 5-IFi can guide preoperative risk stratification or prehabilitation triage.

HealthcareVol. 14(13)
Alfaisal University (SA), Riphah International University (PK), Khyber Teaching Hospital (PK), University of Haripur (PK), University of Peshawar (PK)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Frailty in Older Adults
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.