Preoperative 5-Factor Frailty Index and Clavien–Dindo Grade ≥ II Complications Following Open Radical Nephrectomy: A Prospective Single-Center Cohort Study
Background/Objective: Preoperative frailty assessment before open radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is underused, and prospective data on the 5-Factor Frailty Index (5-IFi) are limited. We examined the association between the preoperative 5-IFi score and postoperative complications at a private tertiary center in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Methods: In this prospective cohort study, 30 adults with suspected or confirmed RCC scheduled for elective open radical nephrectomy were enrolled after ethics approval. The 5-IFi was scored preoperatively from records and medication lists. The primary outcome was any Clavien–Dindo grade ≥ II complication during the index hospitalization; secondary outcomes were length of stay and 30-day unplanned readmission. Groups were compared using Mann–Whitney U and Fisher’s exact tests. Associations were estimated by Firth penalized logistic regression with profile-likelihood confidence intervals (CIs) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis with bootstrapped CIs; adjusted models were exploratory given the sample size. Results: Fourteen patients (46.7%) developed a grade ≥ II complication, all grade II; nine (30.0%) were frail (5-IFi ≥ 2). The 5-IFi score was the only baseline variable significantly associated with the outcome (median 1.5 vs. 1.0; p = 0.030). Each 1-point increase was associated with higher odds (unadjusted OR 2.35, 95% CI 1.16–6.80; adjusted for age and creatinine, OR 2.10, 95% CI 1.00–5.91). Discrimination was moderate but imprecise (AUC 0.72, 95% CI 0.53–0.88). At the ≥2 threshold, frail patients had a higher complication rate than non-frail/pre-frail patients (77.8% vs. 33.3%; Fisher’s exact p = 0.046; exact OR 6.5, 95% CI 0.92–80.65), with sensitivity 50.0% and specificity 87.5%; length of stay was marginally longer in frail patients (p = 0.035). No grade ≥ III complications or deaths occurred. Conclusions: In this small single-center cohort, a higher 5-IFi score was associated with grade ≥ II complications, consistent after limited adjustment. Given the small sample, imprecise estimates, and exclusively grade II events, these findings are preliminary and hypothesis-generating. Multicenter validation is required before the 5-IFi can guide preoperative risk stratification or prehabilitation triage.
Authors
- Sadia Qazi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9275-8022)
- Mohammad Shoaib (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9571-7295)
- Kanza Atif (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4868-0220)
- Azura Rozila Ahmad (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-1745-0865)
- Eshal Atif (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7010-6910)
- Aminah Saqib (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-4453-5822)
- Hukam Rawan Khan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9625-4168)
Institutions
- Alfaisal University (SA)
- Riphah International University (PK)
- Khyber Teaching Hospital (PK)
- University of Haripur (PK)
- University of Peshawar (PK)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Healthcare
- Published
- 2026-06-28
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14131886
- Primary Topic
- Frailty in Older Adults
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00