Inclusive cycle training: Using the <scp>COM</scp> ‐B model to examine the attitudes, perceptions and behaviours of cycle instructors

Abstract This is the first study to comprehensively consider cycle instructor knowledge, motivation and behaviour when teaching children with disabilities. Using a prospective design, we used a questionnaire to measure COM‐B components before ( N = 845), immediately after ( N = 480) and 6 months after ( N = 63) an online course for instructors. We also conducted interviews ( N = 12) 3 months after training. Prior to the course, physical opportunity and psychological capability were the biggest barriers to delivering inclusive cycle training. In addition, motivation was important in predicting adaptations to training. Scores on all factors increased immediately following the course, 6 months later only an increase in psychological capability was maintained. Qualitative data highlighted behavioural changes as a consequence of the course, which were captured in the quantitative data. 6 months after the course social opportunity was an important predictor of behaviour, highlighting the importance of social influence and support. Recommendations from these data focus on social opportunity, that is, how an online community of instructors may provide support in delivering inclusive cycle training. These findings hold global significance as the provision of cycle training appropriate to the needs of each child is crucial in the promotion of cycling as a form of physical activity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs
Published
2026-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.70131
Primary Topic
Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inclusive cycle training: Using the COM ‐B model to examine the attitudes, perceptions and behaviours of cycle instructors

Kate Wilmut, Emma Davies, C. Purcell, S. Gibson
Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs
Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
article

Inclusive cycle training: Using the COM ‐B model to examine the attitudes, perceptions and behaviours of cycle instructors

Kate Wilmut, Emma Davies, C. Purcell, S. Gibson
article en

Abstract

Abstract This is the first study to comprehensively consider cycle instructor knowledge, motivation and behaviour when teaching children with disabilities. Using a prospective design, we used a questionnaire to measure COM‐B components before ( N = 845), immediately after ( N = 480) and 6 months after ( N = 63) an online course for instructors. We also conducted interviews ( N = 12) 3 months after training. Prior to the course, physical opportunity and psychological capability were the biggest barriers to delivering inclusive cycle training. In addition, motivation was important in predicting adaptations to training. Scores on all factors increased immediately following the course, 6 months later only an increase in psychological capability was maintained. Qualitative data highlighted behavioural changes as a consequence of the course, which were captured in the quantitative data. 6 months after the course social opportunity was an important predictor of behaviour, highlighting the importance of social influence and support. Recommendations from these data focus on social opportunity, that is, how an online community of instructors may provide support in delivering inclusive cycle training. These findings hold global significance as the provision of cycle training appropriate to the needs of each child is crucial in the promotion of cycling as a form of physical activity.

Journal of Research in Special Educational NeedsVol. 26(3)
Oxford Brookes University (GB), Cardiff University (GB)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.