Uncovering Biogas Outcomes: Tales of Hubris, Hope, and Failure From Southern Malawi

ABSTRACT The purpose of this article is to speak directly to biogas failure. Over the past two decades, immense amounts of money have been spent by African governments, private individuals, and most conspicuously, international aid agencies and donors, on countless biogas projects in every country on the continent. Yet, despite the investments, biogas has not taken off, and the continent is strewn with the ruins of hundreds of failed and abandoned biogas projects. Moreover, scholarly literature contains little feedback about what actually happens on the ground, and by extension, a lack of critical reflection as to why a biogas revolution that has been perennially over the horizon has yet to arrive. Focusing on southern Malawi, and combining detailed, qualitative, narrative investigation with owners and providers, with on‐site socio‐technical investigation, we unpack 61 in‐depth case studies of small‐scale biogas provision in order to provide narrative descriptions of the practical outcomes of biogas projects from the perspective of adopters and users, in addition to analysis of project outcomes across different models of project implementation. Our findings center the importance of active, engaged owners, but also reveal a connection between the structural nature of specific biogas projects, the relationship of the user to the plant, and the project's resultant outcomes. So although owners matter, different project structures have the ability to create empowered, engaged biogas owners, or conversely, to place them in positions of limited power and influence which can exacerbate project weaknesses. As a consequence, we question the role of top‐down development models within biogas provision and propose alternative pathways for international organizations, such as providing technical knowledge or through support to biogas providers installing for paying and engaged owners, which may be more successful in promoting the development and sustainability of biogas technology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Natural Resources Forum
Published
2026-06-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-8947.70072
Primary Topic
Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Uncovering Biogas Outcomes: Tales of Hubris, Hope, and Failure From Southern Malawi

Jonathan Kwangulero, Natalie Boyd Williams, Jonathan Òlal Ogwang, Marc Kalina et al.
Natural Resources Forum
Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
article

Uncovering Biogas Outcomes: Tales of Hubris, Hope, and Failure From Southern Malawi

Jonathan Kwangulero, Natalie Boyd Williams, Jonathan Òlal Ogwang, Marc Kalina, Elizabeth Tilley
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The purpose of this article is to speak directly to biogas failure. Over the past two decades, immense amounts of money have been spent by African governments, private individuals, and most conspicuously, international aid agencies and donors, on countless biogas projects in every country on the continent. Yet, despite the investments, biogas has not taken off, and the continent is strewn with the ruins of hundreds of failed and abandoned biogas projects. Moreover, scholarly literature contains little feedback about what actually happens on the ground, and by extension, a lack of critical reflection as to why a biogas revolution that has been perennially over the horizon has yet to arrive. Focusing on southern Malawi, and combining detailed, qualitative, narrative investigation with owners and providers, with on‐site socio‐technical investigation, we unpack 61 in‐depth case studies of small‐scale biogas provision in order to provide narrative descriptions of the practical outcomes of biogas projects from the perspective of adopters and users, in addition to analysis of project outcomes across different models of project implementation. Our findings center the importance of active, engaged owners, but also reveal a connection between the structural nature of specific biogas projects, the relationship of the user to the plant, and the project's resultant outcomes. So although owners matter, different project structures have the ability to create empowered, engaged biogas owners, or conversely, to place them in positions of limited power and influence which can exacerbate project weaknesses. As a consequence, we question the role of top‐down development models within biogas provision and propose alternative pathways for international organizations, such as providing technical knowledge or through support to biogas providers installing for paying and engaged owners, which may be more successful in promoting the development and sustainability of biogas technology.

Natural Resources Forum
Families USA (US), ETH Zurich (CH), University of the Western Cape (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.