Boosting Fiscal–Occupational Welfare in Italy: ‘Quiet Politics’ and the Irresistible Attractiveness of (Micro‐)Distributive Policies

ABSTRACT Fiscal–occupational welfare is becoming an increasingly important feature of social protection systems and state–business relations in Europe, reflecting a broader trend towards outsourcing public functions to private actors. In Italy, the 2016 and 2017 Stability Laws significantly expanded its scope and relevance. This article examines the political dynamics that facilitate the adoption of these distinctive forms of social policy and shape their content—an important but underexplored dimension in the literature. Drawing on an in‐depth reconstruction of the political process, based on interviews with key political and social actors, parliamentary documents and media sources, the study highlights the opacity of this policy domain: decision‐making largely unfolded outside public debate, with minimal parliamentary involvement. In this context, although trade unions were formally consulted, the arena was characterised by ‘quiet politics’, allowing well‐resourced economic actors, particularly the main employers' association, to exert strong influence on policy outcomes. The analysis shows that fiscal welfare benefits function not only as distributional instruments but also as strategic tools for securing the support of powerful interest groups, especially in a context of fiscal austerity and constrained public spending. The absence of overt conflict, despite the institutional and distributive implications of these measures, illustrates what can be described as the ‘irresistible attractiveness of (micro‐)distributive policies’.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Policy and Administration
Published
2026-06-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.70087
Primary Topic
Social Policy and Reform Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Boosting Fiscal–Occupational Welfare in Italy: ‘Quiet Politics’ and the Irresistible Attractiveness of (Micro‐)Distributive Policies

Marcello Natili, Matteo Jessoula
Social Policy and Administration
Social Policy and Reform Studies
article

Boosting Fiscal–Occupational Welfare in Italy: ‘Quiet Politics’ and the Irresistible Attractiveness of (Micro‐)Distributive Policies

Marcello Natili, Matteo Jessoula
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Fiscal–occupational welfare is becoming an increasingly important feature of social protection systems and state–business relations in Europe, reflecting a broader trend towards outsourcing public functions to private actors. In Italy, the 2016 and 2017 Stability Laws significantly expanded its scope and relevance. This article examines the political dynamics that facilitate the adoption of these distinctive forms of social policy and shape their content—an important but underexplored dimension in the literature. Drawing on an in‐depth reconstruction of the political process, based on interviews with key political and social actors, parliamentary documents and media sources, the study highlights the opacity of this policy domain: decision‐making largely unfolded outside public debate, with minimal parliamentary involvement. In this context, although trade unions were formally consulted, the arena was characterised by ‘quiet politics’, allowing well‐resourced economic actors, particularly the main employers' association, to exert strong influence on policy outcomes. The analysis shows that fiscal welfare benefits function not only as distributional instruments but also as strategic tools for securing the support of powerful interest groups, especially in a context of fiscal austerity and constrained public spending. The absence of overt conflict, despite the institutional and distributive implications of these measures, illustrates what can be described as the ‘irresistible attractiveness of (micro‐)distributive policies’.

Social Policy and Administration
University of Milan (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Social Policy and Reform Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.