Public Health Service Clinical Journeys of Patients With Primary Substance Use Disorders Who Are Subsequently Diagnosed With Non‐Affective Psychotic Disorders

INTRODUCTION: Psychosis is a debilitating condition and prompt treatment is a key prognostic factor. Early intervention services aim to provide timely care, but co-occurring substance use disorders (SUDs) complicate treatment, leading to poorer outcomes. This study examined the clinical journey of individuals with SUD who were subsequently diagnosed with a psychotic disorder, focusing on the interval between diagnoses to understand this issue. METHODS: Patient pathways were constructed using linked health data (2005-2022) from Western Australia for individuals aged ≥ 18 years with a diagnosis of SUD followed by a primary psychotic disorder. Service events across emergency departments (EDs), inpatient and community mental health services were analysed. Descriptive statistics and subgroup analyses examined variations based on the time between diagnoses, sex, remoteness and socioeconomic status. RESULTS: Analysis of 7568 patient pathways revealed a median diagnostic interval of 1.9 years. Initial SUD diagnoses occurred most frequently in inpatient settings (62%), whilst psychoses diagnoses were most common in EDs (46%). Common diagnostic pathways included inpatient to ED (28%) and inpatient to inpatient (24%). Subgroup analyses showed women had a 7-month longer diagnostic interval and six more mental health service events than men. Remoteness and socioeconomic disadvantage correlated with increased diagnosis in inpatient settings and decreased diagnosis in EDs. CONCLUSION: A significant delay between diagnoses is likely associated with poorer outcomes. Integrated service delivery, particularly between EDs and specialised mental health services, is important for early intervention. Patient demographics and geographic location influence diagnostic pathways, suggesting targeted interventions to improve access to prompt, appropriate care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Early Intervention in Psychiatry
Published
2026-06-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/eip.70211
Primary Topic
Schizophrenia research and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Public Health Service Clinical Journeys of Patients With Primary Substance Use Disorders Who Are Subsequently Diagnosed With Non‐Affective Psychotic Disorders

Peter M. McEvoy, Mathew Coleman, Kim Betts, Daniel Röck et al.
Early Intervention in Psychiatry
Schizophrenia research and treatment
article

Public Health Service Clinical Journeys of Patients With Primary Substance Use Disorders Who Are Subsequently Diagnosed With Non‐Affective Psychotic Disorders

Peter M. McEvoy, Mathew Coleman, Kim Betts, Daniel Röck, Kevin Chai, Crystal Lee, Kyran Graham-Schmidt, Suzanne Robinson, Elvis Rapoo
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Psychosis is a debilitating condition and prompt treatment is a key prognostic factor. Early intervention services aim to provide timely care, but co-occurring substance use disorders (SUDs) complicate treatment, leading to poorer outcomes. This study examined the clinical journey of individuals with SUD who were subsequently diagnosed with a psychotic disorder, focusing on the interval between diagnoses to understand this issue. METHODS: Patient pathways were constructed using linked health data (2005-2022) from Western Australia for individuals aged ≥ 18 years with a diagnosis of SUD followed by a primary psychotic disorder. Service events across emergency departments (EDs), inpatient and community mental health services were analysed. Descriptive statistics and subgroup analyses examined variations based on the time between diagnoses, sex, remoteness and socioeconomic status. RESULTS: Analysis of 7568 patient pathways revealed a median diagnostic interval of 1.9 years. Initial SUD diagnoses occurred most frequently in inpatient settings (62%), whilst psychoses diagnoses were most common in EDs (46%). Common diagnostic pathways included inpatient to ED (28%) and inpatient to inpatient (24%). Subgroup analyses showed women had a 7-month longer diagnostic interval and six more mental health service events than men. Remoteness and socioeconomic disadvantage correlated with increased diagnosis in inpatient settings and decreased diagnosis in EDs. CONCLUSION: A significant delay between diagnoses is likely associated with poorer outcomes. Integrated service delivery, particularly between EDs and specialised mental health services, is important for early intervention. Patient demographics and geographic location influence diagnostic pathways, suggesting targeted interventions to improve access to prompt, appropriate care.

Early Intervention in PsychiatryVol. 20(7)
Deakin University (AU), The University of Western Australia (AU), University of Canberra (AU), Curtin University (AU), Government of Western Australia Department of Health (AU), WA Country Health Service (AU), North Metropolitan Health Service (AU), Centre for Clinical Interventions (AU)
Digital Health CRC
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Schizophrenia research and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.