Breast Cancer Hormone Receptor Status Determination from H&E-Stained Biopsy Images Using Pixel-Level Classifiers

Background: Analysis of digital images of histopathological sections is increasing due to widespread adoption of fully digitised workflows and the greater availability of whole-slide scanners. Currently, hormone receptor status in breast carcinoma is assessed by pathologists scoring separate immunohistochemically stained sections. Methods: In this study, we employed pathologist-verified pixel-level annotations to train nested pixel classifiers capable of making case-level predictions of oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status directly from H&E-stained sections using biopsy cases alone. The model was evaluated on both an internal test set and an external international evaluation set from an institution in a different continent using different scanner hardware without the need for image normalisation. Results: In the internal test set, the models achieved AUCs of 0.8030, 0.7956 and 0.7488 for ER, PR, and HER2, respectively, with AUCs of 0.7008 and 0.7488 for ER and PR using an external cohort from an institution from which no cases were used for training. Conclusions: Our data highlight a potential strategy by which a pixel-based classifier, typically developed to quantify histological features within individual cases, could be used to make case/slide-level predictions but illustrate the challenges associated with this approach.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2026-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18132085
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Breast Cancer Hormone Receptor Status Determination from H&E-Stained Biopsy Images Using Pixel-Level Classifiers

Hideki Ueno, David J. Harrison, Sandrine Prost, Timothy James Kendall et al.
Cancers
AI in cancer detection
article

Breast Cancer Hormone Receptor Status Determination from H&E-Stained Biopsy Images Using Pixel-Level Classifiers

Hideki Ueno, David J. Harrison, Sandrine Prost, Timothy James Kendall, Jonathan Andrew Fallowfield, Shuyang Wu, Alastair Ironside, Hitoshi Tsuda, Ines P. Nearchou
article en

Abstract

Background: Analysis of digital images of histopathological sections is increasing due to widespread adoption of fully digitised workflows and the greater availability of whole-slide scanners. Currently, hormone receptor status in breast carcinoma is assessed by pathologists scoring separate immunohistochemically stained sections. Methods: In this study, we employed pathologist-verified pixel-level annotations to train nested pixel classifiers capable of making case-level predictions of oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status directly from H&E-stained sections using biopsy cases alone. The model was evaluated on both an internal test set and an external international evaluation set from an institution in a different continent using different scanner hardware without the need for image normalisation. Results: In the internal test set, the models achieved AUCs of 0.8030, 0.7956 and 0.7488 for ER, PR, and HER2, respectively, with AUCs of 0.7008 and 0.7488 for ER and PR using an external cohort from an institution from which no cases were used for training. Conclusions: Our data highlight a potential strategy by which a pixel-based classifier, typically developed to quantify histological features within individual cases, could be used to make case/slide-level predictions but illustrate the challenges associated with this approach.

CancersVol. 18(13)
NHS Lothian (GB), University of St Andrews (GB), Western General Hospital (GB), Indra (Spain) (ES), MRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine (GB), Teikyo University Chiba Medical Center (JP), Centre for Inflammation Research (GB), National Defense Medical College (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
AI in cancer detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.