Neurodiversity and Digital Inclusion: Creating the Conditions for Inclusive Education through UDL

Digital technologies are often positioned as tools for access and differentiation, yet their role in creating neurodiversity-affirming inclusive classrooms remains underexamined. This article reports on a two-phase Australian study exploring how digital technologies can create the conditions for inclusive education when guided by the Universal Design for Learning framework. Grounded in the neurodiversity paradigm, critical disability studies and participatory approaches, the study examined how technology can support engagement, representation, action and expression for neurodivergent learners. Phase one involved a rapid mixed-methods literature review of research published over the past decade, combining thematic analysis with chi-squared tests to examine patterns across neurotypes, technologies and inclusive practices. Phase two comprised qualitative case studies across six Australian schools, drawing on classroom observations and interviews with neurodivergent and neurotypical students, teachers and school leaders from Foundation to Year 10. Findings indicate that digital technologies are most inclusive when used to expand learner agency, flexibility, communication and collaboration, rather than to enforce compliance or manage behaviour. Students benefited from tools that scaffolded executive functioning, supported communication, reduced anxiety and offered multiple ways to demonstrate understanding. However, inconsistent implementation, inaccessible design and narrow pedagogical purposes sometimes reinforced exclusion. The study culminated in 36 high-impact recommendations for educators, schools and technology designers. These recommendations emphasise the integration of physical and digital tools, the centring of student voice and the creation of psychologically safe learning environments. The article argues that inclusive digital practice requires a shift from technology as remediation to technology as a means of designing for access, participation and belonging.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Knowledge Commons (Lakehead University)
Published
2026-06-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17613/y5k1g-pfw54
Primary Topic
Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neurodiversity and Digital Inclusion: Creating the Conditions for Inclusive Education through UDL

Rebecca Woolnough, Jess Rowlings, Matthew Harrison, Emily White et al.
Knowledge Commons (Lakehead University)
Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function
article

Neurodiversity and Digital Inclusion: Creating the Conditions for Inclusive Education through UDL

Rebecca Woolnough, Jess Rowlings, Matthew Harrison, Emily White, Melissa Vallence, Ana Potemkin
article en

Abstract

Digital technologies are often positioned as tools for access and differentiation, yet their role in creating neurodiversity-affirming inclusive classrooms remains underexamined. This article reports on a two-phase Australian study exploring how digital technologies can create the conditions for inclusive education when guided by the Universal Design for Learning framework. Grounded in the neurodiversity paradigm, critical disability studies and participatory approaches, the study examined how technology can support engagement, representation, action and expression for neurodivergent learners. Phase one involved a rapid mixed-methods literature review of research published over the past decade, combining thematic analysis with chi-squared tests to examine patterns across neurotypes, technologies and inclusive practices. Phase two comprised qualitative case studies across six Australian schools, drawing on classroom observations and interviews with neurodivergent and neurotypical students, teachers and school leaders from Foundation to Year 10. Findings indicate that digital technologies are most inclusive when used to expand learner agency, flexibility, communication and collaboration, rather than to enforce compliance or manage behaviour. Students benefited from tools that scaffolded executive functioning, supported communication, reduced anxiety and offered multiple ways to demonstrate understanding. However, inconsistent implementation, inaccessible design and narrow pedagogical purposes sometimes reinforced exclusion. The study culminated in 36 high-impact recommendations for educators, schools and technology designers. These recommendations emphasise the integration of physical and digital tools, the centring of student voice and the creation of psychologically safe learning environments. The article argues that inclusive digital practice requires a shift from technology as remediation to technology as a means of designing for access, participation and belonging.

Knowledge Commons (Lakehead University)
The University of Melbourne (AU), SMART Reading (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.