Daring to be great: American statecraft in the progressive era

Abstract This paper provides an analysis of the transition of American statecraft away from the “exemplarist” statecraft of the Founders’ era of United States’ foreign policy towards the “progressive imperialism” of the late nineteenth century. It identifies the consolidation of the power of the federal government and westward expansion at the expense of both Native Americans and the territorial claims of number of European powers as major contributing factors in the development of “vindicationist” forms of statecraft that posited crucial linkages between domestic political and economic stability, and geopolitical dynamics beyond the Western hemisphere. By the first decade of the twentieth century, the ascent of such “vindicationism” embedded the notion in elite discourse that American prosperity and national security required that it be actively engaged in core regions of the globe.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Transatlantic Studies
Published
2026-06-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s42738-026-00175-9
Primary Topic
Asian American and Pacific Histories
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Daring to be great: American statecraft in the progressive era

Michael Clarke
Journal of Transatlantic Studies
Asian American and Pacific Histories
article

Daring to be great: American statecraft in the progressive era

Michael Clarke
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper provides an analysis of the transition of American statecraft away from the “exemplarist” statecraft of the Founders’ era of United States’ foreign policy towards the “progressive imperialism” of the late nineteenth century. It identifies the consolidation of the power of the federal government and westward expansion at the expense of both Native Americans and the territorial claims of number of European powers as major contributing factors in the development of “vindicationist” forms of statecraft that posited crucial linkages between domestic political and economic stability, and geopolitical dynamics beyond the Western hemisphere. By the first decade of the twentieth century, the ascent of such “vindicationism” embedded the notion in elite discourse that American prosperity and national security required that it be actively engaged in core regions of the globe.

Journal of Transatlantic StudiesVol. 24(1)
University of Technology Sydney (AU), Deakin University (AU)
Deakin University
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Asian American and Pacific Histories
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.