Four decades of EU-Senegal fisheries agreements: Sustainability gaps, governance limits and local realities

This article analyses the evolution of fishing agreements between the European Union (EU) and Senegal from 1979 to 2024, by cross-referencing political, economic, social, and ecological dimensions. It highlights a significant gap between the stated ambitions (sustainability, equitable partnership) and the concrete outcomes on the ground. The study, based on a process-tracing method, reveals a persistent under-utilisation of reference tonnages by European fleets, weak implementation of sectoral support in Senegal, limited social acceptability among artisanal fishing actors, and ineffective joint governance. Ecologically, marine ecosystems are degraded, and several stocks are overexploited. These findings raise questions about the EU’s political coherence and the actual relevance of the agreements in the Senegalese context. The article notably recommends strengthening the role of the SRFC for better regional coordination on shared stocks and a collective position in negotiations with the EU.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Marine Policy
Published
2026-06-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2026.107183
Primary Topic
Coastal and Marine Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Four decades of EU-Senegal fisheries agreements: Sustainability gaps, governance limits and local realities

Elhadj Dème
Marine Policy
Coastal and Marine Management
article

Four decades of EU-Senegal fisheries agreements: Sustainability gaps, governance limits and local realities

Elhadj Dème
article en

Abstract

This article analyses the evolution of fishing agreements between the European Union (EU) and Senegal from 1979 to 2024, by cross-referencing political, economic, social, and ecological dimensions. It highlights a significant gap between the stated ambitions (sustainability, equitable partnership) and the concrete outcomes on the ground. The study, based on a process-tracing method, reveals a persistent under-utilisation of reference tonnages by European fleets, weak implementation of sectoral support in Senegal, limited social acceptability among artisanal fishing actors, and ineffective joint governance. Ecologically, marine ecosystems are degraded, and several stocks are overexploited. These findings raise questions about the EU’s political coherence and the actual relevance of the agreements in the Senegalese context. The article notably recommends strengthening the role of the SRFC for better regional coordination on shared stocks and a collective position in negotiations with the EU.

Marine PolicyVol. 193
University of Portsmouth (GB)
University of Portsmouth
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Coastal and Marine Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.