Surgical Infrastructure and Workforce Readiness in Rwanda's District and Level 2 Teaching Hospitals: A Nationwide Facility‐Based Survey

BACKGROUND: Access to safe, timely, and affordable surgical care remains a challenge in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where deficits in infrastructure and workforce are most acute at the district hospital level. From 2018 to 2024, Rwanda implemented its first National Surgical, Obstetric, and Anesthesia Plan (NSOAP) and prioritized decentralized surgical care. We aimed to conduct a post-implementation national assessment of surgical infrastructure, workforce, and service delivery at Rwanda's district and level 2 teaching (L2TH) hospitals. METHODS: We conducted a nationwide cross-sectional survey of 43 hospitals, comprising all 34 district hospitals, and 9 L2TH in Rwanda from May-June 2025, using the WHO Situational Analysis Tool for Emergency and Essential Surgical Care (SAT-EESC). Five domain-specific informants per facility provided infrastructure, workforce, and service delivery data, complemented by facility walk-throughs and a review of operating room registers. In addition to descriptive data analysis, we compared rural and urban hospitals and mapped workforce distribution. RESULTS: All facilities had at least one functional operating room. Most facilities reported continuous electricity and running water, and oxygen cylinders were available at all times in 90.7% of facilities. Blood banks and oxygen concentrators were the least consistently available, reported as available at all times in 32.6% and 58.1% of facilities, respectively. The median facility-level surgeon, anesthesiologist, and obstetrician density was 0.71 per 100,000 population, and 14 hospitals had no specialist SAO cadre. Non-specialist cadres were widely available, with a median non-specialist surgical workforce density of 6.76 per 100,000 population. No statistically significant urban-rural workforce differences were observed, although rural facilities were significantly farther from next-level referral facilities. CONCLUSION: Rwanda's district and level 2 teaching hospitals demonstrate high infrastructure readiness. However, gaps persist in the distribution of the specialist workforce, diagnostics, and advanced surgical care capacity. The findings also highlight the importance of non-specialist cadres in sustaining district-level surgical service delivery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
World Journal of Surgery
Published
2026-06-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.70476
Primary Topic
Global Health and Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Surgical Infrastructure and Workforce Readiness in Rwanda's District and Level 2 Teaching Hospitals: A Nationwide Facility‐Based Survey

Anteneh Gadisa Belachew, Abebe Bekele, Alice Umutoni, Barnabas Tobi Alayande et al.
World Journal of Surgery
Global Health and Surgery
article

Surgical Infrastructure and Workforce Readiness in Rwanda's District and Level 2 Teaching Hospitals: A Nationwide Facility‐Based Survey

Anteneh Gadisa Belachew, Abebe Bekele, Alice Umutoni, Barnabas Tobi Alayande, Menelas Nkeshimana, Nobhojit Roy, Sabin Nsanzimana, Mulugeta Tenna Wolde, Georges Bucyibaruta, Alexander Habte, Emmy Nkusi Agabe, Pierrette Ngutete Mukundwa, Victor Saidi Mithi, Alexandre Muhawenimana, Sarah Warunee Derichs, Marie Merci Cyuzuzo
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Access to safe, timely, and affordable surgical care remains a challenge in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where deficits in infrastructure and workforce are most acute at the district hospital level. From 2018 to 2024, Rwanda implemented its first National Surgical, Obstetric, and Anesthesia Plan (NSOAP) and prioritized decentralized surgical care. We aimed to conduct a post-implementation national assessment of surgical infrastructure, workforce, and service delivery at Rwanda's district and level 2 teaching (L2TH) hospitals. METHODS: We conducted a nationwide cross-sectional survey of 43 hospitals, comprising all 34 district hospitals, and 9 L2TH in Rwanda from May-June 2025, using the WHO Situational Analysis Tool for Emergency and Essential Surgical Care (SAT-EESC). Five domain-specific informants per facility provided infrastructure, workforce, and service delivery data, complemented by facility walk-throughs and a review of operating room registers. In addition to descriptive data analysis, we compared rural and urban hospitals and mapped workforce distribution. RESULTS: All facilities had at least one functional operating room. Most facilities reported continuous electricity and running water, and oxygen cylinders were available at all times in 90.7% of facilities. Blood banks and oxygen concentrators were the least consistently available, reported as available at all times in 32.6% and 58.1% of facilities, respectively. The median facility-level surgeon, anesthesiologist, and obstetrician density was 0.71 per 100,000 population, and 14 hospitals had no specialist SAO cadre. Non-specialist cadres were widely available, with a median non-specialist surgical workforce density of 6.76 per 100,000 population. No statistically significant urban-rural workforce differences were observed, although rural facilities were significantly farther from next-level referral facilities. CONCLUSION: Rwanda's district and level 2 teaching hospitals demonstrate high infrastructure readiness. However, gaps persist in the distribution of the specialist workforce, diagnostics, and advanced surgical care capacity. The findings also highlight the importance of non-specialist cadres in sustaining district-level surgical service delivery.

World Journal of Surgery
University of Rwanda (RW), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Kigali (RW), Rwanda Military Hospital (RW), University of Global Health Equity (RW), Rwanda Biomedical Center (RW), Ministry of Infrastructure (RW), Ministry of Health (RW)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Global Health and Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.