Predicting Mexican Migrant Distress in the U.S. During Intense Immigration Enforcement Periods

U.S. immigration policies and enforcement practices make it increasingly difficult for noncitizens to migrate to their countries of origin freely, which has implications for physical and mental distress. This study seeks to answer: (1) how does immigration enforcement impact Mexican immigrants’ mental and physical distress? And (2) what are the consequences of separation from parents for adult Mexican immigrants? Participants ( n = 2,334, 95% male, M = 48 years, 93% surveyed in Mexico, M = 95 months in the U.S.) come from the Mesoamerican Migration Project. Using cluster-adjusted logistic regression we apply a stress process theoretical framework. After adjusting for various sociodemographic and structural factors, analyses examine how changes in immigration enforcement budgets and “no parental migration” (i.e., neither parent migrating) might influence the well-being of Mexican immigrants. Our expected findings are that (1) intense immigration enforcement will increase the odds of distress, that (2) Mexican immigrants who migrate without their parents will be more likely to experience distress than those who do, and that (3) the negative effect of separation from parents will be exacerbated by longer periods of time in the U.S. Our results do not support the first hypothesis, do support the second hypothesis, and partially support the third hypothesis. Findings identified a negative association between immigration enforcement and levels of distress experienced by Mexican immigrants, but many of the stressors associated with the immigration experience—including separation from parents, use of a coyote, being surveyed during the Trump era, and longer periods of time in the U.S.—significantly increase the odds of distress. These findings highlight how migration patterns shift in the face of enforcement practices, and how individual immigration experiences—most notably separation from parents for adult immigrants—affect the mental and physical well-being of Mexican immigrants.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences
Published
2026-06-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/07399863261462689
Primary Topic
Migration, Health and Trauma
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting Mexican Migrant Distress in the U.S. During Intense Immigration Enforcement Periods

Melissa Thompson, Natalie Cholula
Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences
Migration, Health and Trauma
article

Predicting Mexican Migrant Distress in the U.S. During Intense Immigration Enforcement Periods

Melissa Thompson, Natalie Cholula
article en

Abstract

U.S. immigration policies and enforcement practices make it increasingly difficult for noncitizens to migrate to their countries of origin freely, which has implications for physical and mental distress. This study seeks to answer: (1) how does immigration enforcement impact Mexican immigrants’ mental and physical distress? And (2) what are the consequences of separation from parents for adult Mexican immigrants? Participants ( n = 2,334, 95% male, M = 48 years, 93% surveyed in Mexico, M = 95 months in the U.S.) come from the Mesoamerican Migration Project. Using cluster-adjusted logistic regression we apply a stress process theoretical framework. After adjusting for various sociodemographic and structural factors, analyses examine how changes in immigration enforcement budgets and “no parental migration” (i.e., neither parent migrating) might influence the well-being of Mexican immigrants. Our expected findings are that (1) intense immigration enforcement will increase the odds of distress, that (2) Mexican immigrants who migrate without their parents will be more likely to experience distress than those who do, and that (3) the negative effect of separation from parents will be exacerbated by longer periods of time in the U.S. Our results do not support the first hypothesis, do support the second hypothesis, and partially support the third hypothesis. Findings identified a negative association between immigration enforcement and levels of distress experienced by Mexican immigrants, but many of the stressors associated with the immigration experience—including separation from parents, use of a coyote, being surveyed during the Trump era, and longer periods of time in the U.S.—significantly increase the odds of distress. These findings highlight how migration patterns shift in the face of enforcement practices, and how individual immigration experiences—most notably separation from parents for adult immigrants—affect the mental and physical well-being of Mexican immigrants.

Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences
Portland State University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Migration, Health and Trauma
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.