Information Fields in Psychology and Medicine. A Formal Framework for Psychological Unity and Psychosomatic Medicine.

Psychology has long grappled with the challenge of unifying its diverse theoretical paradigms while accounting for the irreducible complexity of human consciousness. This paper proposes the information field (ΨI) framework as a foundational unifying structure, demonstrating how it formalizes three threads that have run through every serious psychological tradition: the ontic core (the foundational life principle), interconnectedness (the relational field of experience), and the tension between repetition and creativity. Drawing on breakthroughs in quantum physics, information thermodynamics, and phenomenology, we show how information fields (ΨI) dynamics provide a common metric across paradigms — from Freud's unconscious to Jung's synchronicity, from Husserl's Lebenswelt to Kahneman's systematic biases. The formal model is developed in three axioms: nonlocal coupling (the psyche as ontic nucleus in interaction with environmental fields via coupling constants λₖ), teleological unfolding (the self-fulfillment drive toward the subject's ideal), and noise dynamics (the monitor of deflection as a depolarization operator). The authenticity index provides a measurable criterion for therapeutic progress. The coupling constants λₖ are not fitting parameters — they are the formal expression of the organism's intentional structure, the specific field dimensions along which its willing sustains its world. Psychosomatic medicine is addressed through the same framework: somatic symptoms are formalized as field distortions — organizational information that bypasses conscious representation and reaches the body directly. Clinical evidence from 162 sessions with 31 participants confirms the framework's predictive validity: ANS correlations between researcher and subject reach 95–96% during dream narration (p < .0001), and alignment with the recovered field signal (R.7) is the single strongest predictor of outcome satisfaction. Three case studies illustrate the framework's clinical depth across authentication, psychopathology, and creative development. The paper concludes by noting that this framework recovers a task Husserl explicitly handed to psychology and that psychology, by adopting the naturalist model, was unable to take up. The complete epistemological argument — connecting the framework to the phenomenological tradition and the theory of knowledge — is developed in White Paper V.